• bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I didn’t say people don’t redline publicly traded companies. I’m saying not being public doesn’t mean leadership won’t. I’ve personally seen it plenty of times.

    Also, “fiduciary duty” (the “Supreme Court cases” I’m assuming you’re vaguely referring to) does not mean a CEO needs to always slam the gas at all times to maximize every single red cent at the cost of all medium and longterm considerations. This is a commonly parroted assertion by people online without a basis. “Fiduciary duty” and other obligations to the shareholders simply mean they can’t make obviously bad decisions that will hurt the shareholders. They don’t get hauled off by the Investor Police if they make a single longterm decision at the expense of a little short term profit.

    All of this isn’t to say we don’t see it happen all the time anyway. But if it was so strict we’d see more CEO’s hauled off, not golden parachutes everywhere as they break their companies apart.

    • miss phant@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think your original comment has a typo on “isn’t”, hence the confusion.

      if a company is a public that they aren’t potentially ruthlessly profit driven.