• TootSweet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 days ago

    Seems really dodgy to me making your business model holding security features hostage for either money or sign-ups, honestly.

    Kindof like charging people for vaccines against deadly diseases or something.

    But then again, my craw may be extra susceptible to sticking when it comes to such things.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      How do you think research for vaccines is funded? Someone pays for vaccines for deadly diseases eventually

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          In any case, the company who makes the vaccines doesn’t pay it. Ubuntu could make the argument you get the security upgrades if the government wants to pay for them

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      From my look at it, Ubuntu is making it clear that they guarantee support for 10 years, rather than just the standard 4 of LTS releases. And they are also guaranteeing compliance for enterprise uses, saving the paperwork load and time. This could make Ubuntu Pro attractive for enterprises and the IT department. Everyone wants to limit the paperwork checks. Us plebes, can make do with the free standard 4 years of LTS support if that’s what you want.

      I’m quite sure that any distro that offers enterprise solutions is doing similar things just for the money. RedHat does it for sure. But us plebes don’t ever see it because we use Fedora instead.