vegeta@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 11 days agoWitness tells House Ethics Committee that Matt Gaetz paid her for sex: Sourcesabcnews.go.comexternal-linkmessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up1563arrow-down13
arrow-up1560arrow-down1external-linkWitness tells House Ethics Committee that Matt Gaetz paid her for sex: Sourcesabcnews.go.comvegeta@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 11 days agomessage-square62fedilink
minus-squareCharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down9·11 days agoI seem to recall that some papers took it upon themselves to publish names and pictures of “Johns” - I guess prostitution is legal for some, but not for others? Some Johns deserve to be named and shamed, but others, not so much?
minus-squareprettybunnys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up28arrow-down1·11 days agoDoes the title not say his name and does the article not have his picture? What are you saying here? The “John” is Matt Gaetz. He paid for sex. He allegedly (and very likely did) groomed and raped minors. He is named.
minus-squareirreticent@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-210 days agoYou mean to say that child sex trafficking Matt Gaetz also pays for sex? I’m shocked! Edit: typo
I seem to recall that some papers took it upon themselves to publish names and pictures of “Johns” - I guess prostitution is legal for some, but not for others? Some Johns deserve to be named and shamed, but others, not so much?
Does the title not say his name and does the article not have his picture?
What are you saying here?
The “John” is Matt Gaetz. He paid for sex. He allegedly (and very likely did) groomed and raped minors. He is named.
You mean to say that child sex trafficking Matt Gaetz also pays for sex? I’m shocked!
Edit: typo