• tiredofsametab@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I don’t actually care about the linguistic side of it; we call a green traffic signal a blue light here in Japan (and the new ones are more blueish, but the old ones were much more green). I think Vietnamese and other languages do that.

    When I skimmed the article, it was arguing that people literally could not see the blue, or at least was worded thusly where I looked before noping out of there. The literal title is “Hidden Hue: Why Ancient Civilizations Failed to See the Color Blue?” Not “failed to give it its own name” but “failed to see”.

    Edit: punctuation.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Clickbait be clickbait and half the site is probably ai generated. I wont defend the hyperbole.

      Theres is a debate you can have to what attributes to seeing in relation to perception. Our mind has a lot of tricks to get around the restrictions of our eyes.

      Its a shame how enshitification erodes this conversation.

      • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah, there are definitely interesting conversations to be had. I actually saw an interesting video on the vision/linguistic side. I was just trying to find it to share but, speaking of enshitification, yoube’s search is ass. Why can’t I search in my subscriptions?!