• yannic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    No port forwarding, though. Some old guides still list them as having that capability, so I try to mention it frequently.

    • Daxtron2@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve never used that feature in any of my VPN clients before. What’s the actual usecase for it?

      • filcuk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Possibly if one might want to be able to access a service behind the VPN without having a load balancer / reverse proxy?

      • yannic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t see why having options are turn-offs except maybe for those who provide said options.

        • DannyMac@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I don’t understand. I mean I see why not having port forwarding would turn someone off from going with Mullvad, but I understand Mullvad’s rationale for doing so.

          • yannic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I understand their decision to stop offering it, too, especially if I were in their position as a service provider. I still like the feature as a consumer.