- cross-posted to:
- globalnews
- cross-posted to:
- globalnews
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/1891139
Archived version: https://archive.ph/OvFse
Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20230825144949/https://www.euronews.com/culture/2023/08/23/billboards-featuring-onlyfans-model-ruled-not-overtly-sexual-by-uk-advertising-watchdog
She’s advertising her ability to titillate, not her personality or intrinsic value and self-worth. Even with your edit, you’re still equating the persona she adopts for her business with her value as a person.
The ability to titillate IS an intrinsic value, a human one at that. You’re probably just sour that you don’t feel you have that ability, so you want to deny the existence and power of the ability to titilate on a human value basis.
Projecting much?
I don’t have any personal desire to do any sex work. But women who are less conventionally attractive or who don’t feel confident on camera are not any less valuable than those who do. You’re equating a woman’s value as a human to her sex appeal and that’s disgusting.
You don’t need to do sex work to be a human and appreciate the human experience of being titilated or titillating someone else. It’s a wonderful part of the human experience.
You keep insisting that you know what I’m talking about, for whatever fucking reason, and you’re consistently wrong. Why are you like this?
Stop putting your words in my mouth, they taste like shit
Wow, you really went directly from “possibly just a poorly written comment” to “actually is just an absolute cunt”, didn’t you?
thanks for your valuable opinon lmao
You’re welcome. Try to do better next time, kiddo.
wheres my fucking candy
I said try to do better next time, not worse. If you really are as young as your posts make you seem, it’s wayyyy past your bedtime, slugger. Don’t forget to brush your teeth!