Gmail isn't a common carrier and is protected by Section 230, judge rules.
  • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
    69·
    10 months ago

    Spam filters are also built with users in mind.

    If users are hitting the spam button, that’s people signaling that the email is shit.

    If people are telling them to shut up, that’s not bias, that’s “your words are garbage to GTFO”

    • gullible@kbin.social
      43·
      10 months ago

      Sent an email to my local representative looking to improve things locally. No response, but I was signed up for several newsletters and campaign donation lists after that. Nearly as upsetting as the endless torrent of advertisements from the vet that put down my dog. No, I’m not in the market for heart worm medication anymore. Fuck that vet, and fuck my local rep.

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      82·
      10 months ago

      Also, spam filters are trained by user response. Guess what personality type/computer education level is more likely to hit “REPORT SPAM” button versus the more technologically sophisticated and patient methods of deleting an email, unsubscribing, or filtering out, and how that may relate to their political party.

      • meat_popsicle@kbin.social
        30·
        10 months ago

        I work in IT and hit Spam on everything I perceive as spam.

        Poison all the data and fuck spammers straight to hell, tyvm.

        • squiblet@kbin.social
          318·
          10 months ago

          I’ve seen some people deal with newsletters they signed up for that way and it’s unarguably a misuse and abuse of the system. “I don’t want these messages any longer” is not the same as unsolicited or abusive mail. For instance I see a small chocolate company and a granola company in my spam folder in gmail. Do they “spam”? No, there’s a really huge difference between e-mail marketing and spam. It sounds like what you ‘perceive’ as spam is based on not really knowing what it is.

          Poison all the data

          Is that some juvenile badassery or something?

          fuck spammers straight to hell, tyvm.

          yes, fuck spammers but not small companies doing email marketing. Email marketing is the only effective way to grow a business online these days without paying some giant fuckstick corporation like Facebook, so I don’t believe what you stated is accomplishing what seems to be your goal. If you make email marketing unusable, that helps google sell ads.

          • BaconIsAVeg@lemmy.mlEnglish
            21·
            10 months ago

            Email marketing is the only effective way to grow a business online these days

            Sorry, but I call horse_shit_ on this. If the only way you can grow your business is to shovel your garbage into my personal inbox, then it’s spam, plain and simple.

            If I have to give you my e-mail address to order something and you default “sign up for more of my bullshit” to checked, then fuck you.

            • salton@reddthat.com
              7·
              10 months ago

              I see this as “Did I intend to get this email?” Then nothing happens. If I did not intent to receive it then it is spam because I never intentionally subscribe to any marketing emails.

          • some_guy@kbin.social
            82·
            10 months ago

            You’ve never done something and thought “oh hell this isn’t want I signed up for”?

            misuse and abuse

            🤣

            Do you, by chance, run a business that sends out mass email spam?

            • squiblet@kbin.social
              34·
              10 months ago

              No, I sure don’t. I don’t have anything to do with companies that do legitimate email marketing, either. But I am able to understand the difference.

              I’m not sure what the stupid emoji is supposed to mean, by the way.

          • Durotar@lemmy.ml
            3·
            10 months ago

            No, there’s a really huge difference between e-mail marketing and spam.

            From Wikipedia:

            Spamming is the use of messaging systems to send multiple unsolicited messages (spam) to large numbers of recipients for the purpose of commercial advertising.

            So yeah, what you described is spam by definition.

            • squiblet@kbin.social
              1·
              10 months ago

              No, the difference i have noted is solicited vs unsolicited. If you sign up for something it is solicited as based on the definition of the word. Deciding you no longer wish to receive it is different than if you never signed up in the first place. Amazing how confused people are about this.

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        6·
        10 months ago

        unsubscribing

        Great way to show an e-mail spammer that the address works and is monitored by a human. Standard IT guidance for at least two decades has been to NOT use unsubscribe.

        and how that may relate to their political party.

        If there is a correlation between tech savvy and political party it’s so small as to be meaningless.

        • squiblet@kbin.social
          42·
          10 months ago

          That’s for actual spam, not merely a newsletter or marketing email you don’t wish to receive any longer. The distinction is my entire point. If you signed up for something and don’t wish to receive it any longer, that’s not spam.

          Older people are more likely to be republicans. Older people are also less likely to be technologically sophisticated.