Parsani [love/loves, comrade/them]@hexbear.net to urbanism@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agotrains plshexbear.netimagemessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up1282arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1280arrow-down1imagetrains plshexbear.netParsani [love/loves, comrade/them]@hexbear.net to urbanism@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square65fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·edit-21 year agoSan Francisco? Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas, Atlanta, Miami, Philadelphia and Boston would all like a word. Los Angeles and Chicago in particular.
minus-squareiridaniotter [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·edit-21 year agoPopulation-wise some of those are too low compared to Chinese T1 cities. But there’s no official definition so…
minus-squareClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·1 year agoYeah I wouldn’t expect any of those except maybe LA to be considered tier 1, I said those ones because they’re all larger than San Francisco lol
minus-squarezephyreks@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 year agoSan Francisco has a healthy and vibrant metro surrounding it though. There’s Oakland to the East and the entirety of Silicon Valley to the South (including San Jose).
minus-squareClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoEven including that it doesn’t break 8 million people
minus-squarezephyreks@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoBoston isn’t even close to tier 1.
minus-squareClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI agree but it’s closer than San Fransisco
minus-squarezephyreks@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoIn terms of population or infrastructure?
minus-squarecorgiwithalaptop [any, love/loves]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year ago Chicago in particular. puts down pizza hello!
San Francisco? Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas, Atlanta, Miami, Philadelphia and Boston would all like a word. Los Angeles and Chicago in particular.
Population-wise some of those are too low compared to Chinese T1 cities. But there’s no official definition so…
Yeah I wouldn’t expect any of those except maybe LA to be considered tier 1, I said those ones because they’re all larger than San Francisco lol
San Francisco has a healthy and vibrant metro surrounding it though. There’s Oakland to the East and the entirety of Silicon Valley to the South (including San Jose).
Even including that it doesn’t break 8 million people
Boston isn’t even close to tier 1.
I agree but it’s closer than San Fransisco
In terms of population or infrastructure?
puts down pizza hello!