• FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      The article/meme specifically states the canon was experimental and the canon never saw battle.

      Also didn’t ships already have canons capable of tearing down masts with chained balls by that time?

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 months ago

        The difference there, chain shot, is that the chain is still fairly short, because you can’t really get a large length of chain to reliably ‘unfold’ from a single projectile when fired. This beast had a chain that started unfurled, attached to each cannon ball, and long enough to go all the way down each of the barrels - making it, theoretically, have a massive spread of chain which could scythe down large numbers of troops in formation, instead of just a handful (for which one would generally prefer grapeshot, shrapnel, or canister).

          • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            It would work in the sense that you’d now have two cannonballs being lifted up towards the gun and crew when the center ball left the barrel only for them to smash violently into each other assuming they don’t smash into something else first, lol.

          • Agent641@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            More beads. Like, 20 of them. Load one, put the others up my bum. Fire the cannon. Pure bliss.