• Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    5 months ago

    You don’t think there’s an evolutionary advantage to getting at girls first when they’re young as possible before other guys do? You don’t think that advantage from that behavior got passed into genes? Why do you think it happens? There’s no rational sociably equitable reason for it. I’m not sitting here condoning it. It’s obviously bad. Youth generally comes with all the indicators of health. I don’t think you consider the word ‘natural’ the same way I do. You think of natural as being ‘okay and healthy’ and I think of it as ‘wild, competitive, and not consciously regulated’. Behavior is not generally without reason. Everything is because of reasons.

    • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Against my better judgement I’m gonna try to respond to this.

      You don’t think there’s an evolutionary advantage to getting at girls first when they’re young as possible before other guys do?

      To begin with, prepubescent girls can’t get pregnant. After that, young girls have an increased risk of not being able to carry a pregnancy to term, dying in childbirth, and of birthing children who end up underdeveloped.

      You don’t think that advantage from that behavior got passed into genes?

      No, then it would likely be more commonplace instead of being abnormal.

      Youth generally comes with all the indicators of health.

      I strongly disagree with this assessment when it comes to people who have not physically developed into adulthood yet.

      Behavior is not generally without reason. Everything is because of reasons.

      Sometimes those reasons are because something has gone wrong. Or because of random chance. To think every behavior fulfills an intended purpose that is evolutionarily beneficial is unscientific in my view.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Ok so I’m not taking about pedophilia I guess. It’s the middle ground one where’s it’s post puberty because that’s what makes sense. Gotta also consider the social aspect of it. Claiming a girl while she’s still so young is likely to mean she’s around when she can have a baby.

        You’re right that some behavior can be totally random because of an error and the error is reason, but it really seems like there’s a LOT of pedophiles and rapists. I can only imagine there’s a much more compelling reason.

        Edit: I’m glad you’re not one of the trolls.

        • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I would blame more of it on social conditioning than on genetics. Our instincts and urges provide a baseline to steer us in the direction that historically has been beneficial to for survival, but those are not what ultimately what decide our actions, nor are they always even beneficial.

          One example comes to mind is men not talking about their feelings, not only does it exacerbate mental health issues and cause a great deal of personal anguish and even death, it also increases the likelihood of interpersonal violence which is bad for society at large.

          I think the reason why people react the way they do is not because they are trolls but rather because it very much comes off as you making excuses for pedophilia, which is already a very sensitive subject to talk about.

        • dvoraqs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          “getting at girls” “as young as possible”, even post-puberty is basically pedophilia, do you not agree?

          • Mango@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Not by definition, no. People generally call anything under 18 pedophilia though, so I’m rolling with that language.

    • fosho@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      this sounds like incel logic disguised as sensible evolutionary science. we have social etiquette that requires treating these topics with a delicacy that you have completely ignored which raises all sorts of red flags. if you want to be listened to about controversial topics then you are going about it in an awful way.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        Etiquette stops the instant someone calls me a pedophile, incel, or otherwise tries to their me under a bus. Get fucked.

    • VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      That first sentence made me physically recoil. What is wrong with you? Go seek help, for all of our sakes.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        What’s wrong with me? Absolutely nothing. I’m just looking at evidence and not covering my eyes pretending everyone is above the shit they’re consistently caught doing.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes, obviously, but evolution is slow. The last 100,000 years has done next to nothing.