FenrirIII@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 5 months agoExploited ruleslrpnk.netimagemessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1882arrow-down113file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1869arrow-down1imageExploited ruleslrpnk.netFenrirIII@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square45fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareiknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoNot necessarily. Increases in productivity could have been split between labor and capital, giving benefits to both. (Or even better, gone just to labor, but that would not be a “both lines go up” scenario.)
minus-square𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-25 months agoYes. I was referring to how capitalism tended to have worked in the past decade or so, and not to how to actually make the line go up. E: autocorrect
Not necessarily.
Increases in productivity could have been split between labor and capital, giving benefits to both. (Or even better, gone just to labor, but that would not be a “both lines go up” scenario.)
Yes. I was referring to how capitalism tended to have worked in the past decade or so, and not to how to actually make the line go up.
E: autocorrect