The all-American working man demeanor of Tim Walzā€”Kamala Harrisā€™s new running mateā€”looks like itā€™s not just an act.

Financial disclosures show Tim Walz barely has any assets to his name. No stocks, bonds, or even property to call his own. Together with his wife, Gwen, his net worth is $330,000, according to aĀ reportĀ by theĀ Wall Street JournalĀ citing financial disclosures from 2019, the year after he became Minnesota governor.

With that kind of meager nest egg, he would be more or less in line with theĀ median figureĀ for Americans his age (heā€™s 60), and even poorer than the average. One in 15 Americans is a millionaire, a recent UBS wealth reportĀ discovered.

Meanwhile, the gross annual income of Walz and his wife, Gwen, amounted to $166,719 before tax in 2022, according to their joint return filed that same year. Walz is even entitled to earn more than the $127,629Ā salary he receivesĀ as state governor, but he has elected not to receive the roughly $22,000 difference.

ā€œWalz represents the stable middle class,ā€ tax lawyer Megan Gorman, who authored a book on the personal finances of U.S. presidents, told the paper.

  • krellor@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    Ā·
    3 months ago

    The defacto standard for economists recording and reporting average and median net worth has been to bucket it by age cohort for at least the last seventy years. Using common meanings of the terms isnā€™t baiting and switching it intending to deceive or bury the lede.

    • Bgugi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      They could have left a naked ā€œaverageā€ at the end of the sentence and it would have made sense to assume ā€˜appropriate methodsā€™. They could have thrown in an appropriate qualifier do describe the cohort theyā€™re comparing him to ā€œmost people approaching retirement age.ā€

      They chose to say ā€œthe average Americanā€ which makes the statement somewhere between misleading and an outright fabrication.

      • krellor@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        3 months ago

        If weā€™re going that route you may as well take issue with the word ā€œaverageā€ instead of using mean, median, or mode. Because the lack of specificity there is even greater than leaving off the age modifier.

        But the whole thing is a weird pedantic exercise anyway. They are reporting using the standard models in a way that makes sense to the reader.