• aard@kyu.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Paid and FOSS are not mutually exclusive. You can always build packages yourself if you don’t want to pay. A well executed implementation might allow some projects to drop or reduce their play store efforts.

    • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Paid and FOSS are mutually exclusive. Open source and FOSS aren’t.

      But how, you ask? Free means having the right to do whatever you want with your copy including make copies and redistribute. Thus, how can it be free while demanding a payment before allowing usage?

      That’s why I said, FOSS Droid? Nah! Open Source Droid? Knock yourself out. I’m actually looking forward to supporting some of the developers of apps I love.

      • Undearius@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        And the “free” means “freedom”, it doesn’t mean “no price”

      • rtxn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Free does not mean “no payment, ever”. If the source code and build toolchain are openly and completely available, but prebuilt binaries are paid-only, it still satisfies the “free as in gratis” criterion.

        • Possibly linux
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Unless the payment method involves proprietary software. Also online payments are service as a software substitute (SaaS)