• sunglocto
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    This was resolved and the PR was merged

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      No, it wasn’t. You might say that the issue was sidestepped, because it says “it”, rather than “they”, now.

      I guess it was an overreaction by mastodon, though. Even if I understand the initial criticism.

      • sunglocto
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        ‘It’ is gender neutral so it was resolved

          • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            A PR fixing all those issues was merged.

            They used “they” when referring to a person, and “it” when referring to a process (the author used “he” when referring to a process calling another process, when he should have used “it.”)

              • sunglocto
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Does it matter? It’s the same outcome either way

                • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  It doesn’t really address the core of the issue. Also: you said something wrong and ri corrected you, while acknowledging that the text was gender neutral now. What’s the big deal?