• Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    292
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Aren’t you supposed to plan appearances like this ahead of time to prevent this exact thing from happening?

    • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      179
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Plan? The only plan they got is project 2025. I don’t think it spells out how to order donuts without acting weird.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        83
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Imagine ordering ANYTHING as vaguely as “some of this, some of that, whatever makes sense”.

        “Sir, that’s not even a real order. I don’t have time for your bullshit.”

        • Lasherz12@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          3 months ago

          Reminds me of customers at the bank I used to work for who would want the teller to pick which account the money went into. Like bro, make an effort.

        • Kalysta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          In his defense. And that’s the only time i will ever say that. The Dunkin Donuts around here will do a mixed dozen where the employee just puts 12 random flavors in the box. It’s possible he was expecting that.

      • psmgx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        3 months ago

        The heritage foundation did serious planning.

        Then they outsourced it to these guys, who didn’t do shit.

    • Glide@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Imagine being born in a position of privledge, and never being told “no” in your entire life. Why would you ever make a plan when you make the subconscious assumption that everyone operates around what you want?

      On a related note, this is why “Woke” is so offensive to people like JD Vance. “We were doing just fine before you people started complaining!” is an easy thought to have from the lap of luxuryn

      • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Why would you ever make a plan when you make the subconscious assumption that everyone operates around what you want?

        Because their whole life has been geared toward allowing them to believe they are entitled to everything.

        As always, calling others “entitled” was pure projection.

      • AWildMimicAppears@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        from my understanding (and thats making the whole situation even more baffling) he grew up in a ohioan blue-collar family, which means he probably heard “no” more then enough.

        especially regarding the family couch.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      3 months ago

      They’re all magas here were I work so it didn’t work out as well, but our congressional rep planned a stop over here so I planned a day off. I wish more people would have done that, but I live in asshole land. :/

      • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        3 months ago

        When I worked at a store that sold guns in 2016, supposedly there was a chance that a certain oddly-colored cheeto would be making a PR appearance after a speech in town.

        I straight up told my manager if they actually think it’s a real possibility then I will not be returning to work after my lunch break. I don’t think for a second my threat actually made a difference, but I’d like to think my manager and district manager would take their ONLY trained tech for their most profitable services in 8 states and risk them leaving over a PR stunt they know will piss off half the people who shop there.

        However when one of the red hats found out that the district manager called corporate to say it wasn’t a good idea, they quit. Granted, nobody cared since it was their first week, but I know they were talking about being desperate for work they were qualified for that won’t do a background check. So they quit over stupid shit when they apparently needed the money.

        Logic is not strong with that crowd.

    • pachrist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Planning is only as good as the planner. Sometimes you still end up giving a press conference at the wrong Four Seasons.

    • experbia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      they’re so full of themselves they cannot conceive of someone who doesn’t want to comply with them and get a moment of fame on TV. that person denying to be on camera probably destroyed his mood for the whole day as he wondered what he did- “there’s no way she hates me so much she doesn’t want to be seen on TV next to me… I’m famous!”

  • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    172
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    This clip proved to me that couchfucker Vance is definitely not “from the middle class”

    Hes obviously never ordered donuts himself. No clue what they are, expects to walk in and get handed a box of glazed donuts and a box of mixed donuts, while people are amazed and happy to have “someone like him” in the store.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I mean… if all you ever did was buy donuts at a supermarket, you kind of would expect that.

      I don’t buy a lot of donuts (personally not a big fan and they make for weird interactions at work) but when I do? My order is usually “Uh. Three or four boston creme, three or four jelly, and then whatever you have a lot of for the rest”. And I have definitely done the Dunkin run where it is “a box o joe and then two dozen of whatever donuts. Also <insert breakfast standwich here>.”

      So I won’t fault couch fucker for having a hard time picking out donuts or basically just saying “I don’t care, just give me two dozen donuts. Feel free to pick the stale ones”. But it is more just the overall shitshow of it for not having someone run up ahead to make sure the store and staff were cool with it.

      Story time! Back in… damn I guess it would have been 08? Obama and Biden were doing the “man of the people” bullshit. Incredibly blue region with strong ties to Biden so it was basically a freebie to record a few press bits. Was getting lunch and chatting with a buddy about all the cars on the street and the like when some 20-something year old girl in a suit comes in. She leans in and asks the person at the counter something and then comes around to the various tables to make small talk and ask leading but kind of inflammatory questions. She asked us what our views on abortion were (and, while I won’t repeat what my buddy said because it was definitely sexist, it was quite possibly the greatest failed pick-up line of all time). She then gets up and states something like “In five minutes, Obama and Biden will be walking through that door. We apologize for the inconvenience. As we get closer, anyone who does not want to be on camera will be directed to move over towards that wall. It will only be for ten minutes and we will pay for everyone’s meal, regardless of if you are on camera or not. Thank you”.

      And, let me tell you? Buying lunch for a bunch of students goes a long way toward making for a warm reception. And while it was obvious they had been prepped on the menu, it was also obvious that this was the kind of food both future presidents ate semi-regularly. And it was obvious they had been prepped on which tables were likely avid democrats, which were republicans, and which were dumbass kids who were hitting on the point person for the casual “So, what can we do to earn your vote?” style bits.

      But… that is kind of the thing. It is not a complicated bit of theatre. I am sure the approach has changed a bit (now that everyone has camera phones and tiktok) but it still holds true. Have someone run ahead to make sure you aren’t entering a hostile situation that will just make everyone look bad.


      Everything blurs together and I am too lazy to google, but now I am wondering if that press event was specifically because everyone (of the republicans) were losing their god damned mind over the existence of a black man. Err, I mean Obama liking dijon mustard or something. So have him and his old white guy buddy eat some normal people food (because dijon mustard is insanely fancy, obviously).

        • NuXCOM_90Percent
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Like I said, I am not a big fan of donuts. A lot of people aren’t. But there is the expectation that everyone should bow down to the person who brought them to the breakroom and join the mad rush when the email goes out and so forth. Not to mention that some people DO like donuts (more power to them) and might be polite enough to ask if anyone minds if they take a second one which has led to a few slack chats of everyone feeling the need to list that they had 1 and so forth. Which invariably reveals who didn’t have any and leads to “oh, are you on a diet”? level conversations that can make others feel self conscious about their weight.

          Personally? I am a big fan of bringing a box to an early morning meeting or whatever. Absolutely hate bringing them to a breakroom or, for the truly deranged, walking them around an office.

          Things have gotten a lot better in the past decade or so of “I don’t eat gluten” becoming ridiculously common. But I find it still puts people into unnecessarily awkward situations where one person might think it is a nothingburger of an interaction and someone else might take it as “Are you saying I am fat and need to go on a diet?”

            • NuXCOM_90Percent
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              Think whatever you want.

              This is the kind of stuff that comes up when you are actually focusing on inclusiveness and discrimination in the workplace (rather than just checking a box for a federal requirement). Something as simple as passing CVs through OCR and standardizing the font (or using those god awful webforms) goes a long way because people genuinely do have an unconscious bias toward one style over another. Similar to evaluating people on things like “poise” or “articulateness”, that is just a REALLY good way to suddenly realize that you hired 90 of the same person.

              And that also covers what kind of group activities you have at work. Because someone might seem “stand offish” because they don’t participate in a monthly pizza lunch because they don’t eat meat or just hate the chain the admin’s cousin owns. But now you put them in a position where someone else might think they are standoffish or “too socially awkward to work in a team” which can have career implications.

              I’ve never been at a workplace that banned these practices. Likely because… it is a shitshow waiting to happen if anyone ever sees that email and posts online about how Innertrode bans donuts. But it is something that management and project leads are increasingly being made aware of to both curb their own unconscious bias and to avoid creating those kinds of situations in the first place.

              • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Well… Good thing I don’t work in an office. I still think you are overthinking this. Bringing unconscious bias into this is clearly missing the mark. It’s free donuts, not a pizza party.

                People don’t like working at an office. I know I didn’t, and I’m so glad I don’t anymore. It’s a small thing that brings a few people just a little bit more joy, and not at the expense of others.

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I hate your workplace.

            Just err towards too many donuts the first time, and then adjust downward as needed. It’s okay to throw out a few.

            And then trust everyone else to be human. If one dude is taking five, someone will eventually give him a “dude, seriously?” and that should be enough. And if it’s not, try to deal with it person to person instead of sending a passive aggressive email about it to two dozen people.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The anecdote of the recon girl in the suit is one of the most interesting that I’ve read in some time. Totally makes sense that they would do that.

        How do folks feel about whether that low level of deceit is appropriate?

        When I think about the costs, I think maybe a couple people spent a couple minutes of their time giving opinions they might not have if they had had all the information up front. But tiny hurt feelings seems the biggest downside, I guess, which shouldn’t be too problematic.

        Of course if the staffer told the whole truth, an activist could feign support to secure an interaction where they shout down the candidate on their pet issue (“a TAN suit, Barrack?!”).

        • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          Personally, I don’t see any deciet here.

          Nobody claimed anything, someone just went around asking questions. Personally I wouldn’t care if a red hat came into my Cafe and asked questions like that, and I would give my very strong opinions exactly as I would to anyone else. If they said a republican was about to come in for a PR stunt, I would ask to speak to the owner, and if they’re actually cool with that the they have lost my business.

          I still wouldn’t feel like the person who came in was being in nay way subversive.

          Honestly if I ran across one of their candidates alone in the middle of the night I might feel the urge to deck them whether I act on it or not, but that exact thing is the reason they should go without stating the reason for the questions and visit fist thing. What if someone were just psychotic and armed? They could quite easily pretend to be the world’s largest supporter in order to get a seat at the next table over for a better shot, instead of the scout saying “that guy in the corner gave strange vibes, better put extra security over there or pass on this one”

          Or someone might start throwing shoes…

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      He’s the guy in the suburbs with the “cowboy up” stickered lifted fuel tuned diesel on 38’s that he’s upside down on payments on because he spent this months trust fund payout on cocaine and ED pills.

      We all know that guy.

      • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        The guy with knotted tires run half-baked because he only drives it on paved roads, the dirtiest it gets is when it rains, and the most it’s ever hauled is a kids seat in the back. He was so close to buying a boat but always complains about gAs PrIcEs

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    165
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I like how she asked not to be filmed and they filmed her anyway and then released it.

    It really shows how much they care about a woman’s consent.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Could be even more sinister than that. Like if you think about it, why would they want to show that? It doesn’t show anything positive about his campaign or engagement, so releasing that footage won’t help him directly. But he is aware of how aggressive some of Trump’s supporters can be with people they hate. So I wonder if he decided to post that part of the video specifically to trigger the MAGAs that would harass (or worse) the business and/or employees.

    • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t know what the situation in the states is, but wouldn’t she be allowed to sue him for this, because they disrespected their privacy?

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        She should. It’s a “public” place, but it’s not like she chose to be there at that moment because she knew Vance was going to be there. She has no other choice than to be there, per the terms of her contract.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It really shows how much they care about a woman’s consent.

      I don’t need consent from my TV in order to watch it.

      Edit: Ran afoul of Poe’s Law. “Surely no one would actually believe I was serious right?”
      Internet: Gestures broadly

      • hperrin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Are you comparing a living breathing woman who’s doing her job to your TV? Like, you do know you need consent to film in a private establishment, right?

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I dropped the /s
          The point being they consider women to be objects so why would they care about her consent?

          • hperrin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            Fair enough. I could definitely see a right wing fascist leaving that exact comment. It was very Matt Walshy. xD

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    147
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    This is why people say magapublicans are weird, they’re so out of touch!

    Has Vance never been in a bakery before!? Quick tip: when they ask you what you want, don’t reply “I mean a lot of glazed here. Some sprinkle stuff. Some of these cinnamon rolls. Just whatever makes sense.”

    What??

    Try ordering from the menu. Or ask them what’s good. Or request an assortment of the most popular kinds…

    • zcd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s one donut JD, how much could it cost, $10?

    • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Or lean into your stupid richness. Buy five of everything and just start handing them out.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh, no. The one thing rich people never want to do is give people handouts!

        • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          They’d claim they handed them out, but in reality only their team got one each, and the rest were thrown away (and sprinkled with poison to make sure they don’t get pulled out of the dumpster)

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I mean, I think he really did want to count out one each. I’m not sure the man has ever bought donuts in his life.

        • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Rich people want their own handouts cause they deserve it unless those filthy plebs. Those plebs are only taking advantage of the system.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      If I were trying to be fair, I’d argue that that basically was an attempt to order an assorted dozen, albeit an awkward one.

      But fascists don’t deserve fairness, so I won’t.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I bet Walz stops at a donut shop tomorrow. I think he knows his way around one quite well.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      This sounds awfully close to “Dijon mustard on a burger! How out of touch can you be!” Levels of ridiculousness.

    • gandalf_der_12te@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      “I mean a lot of glazed here. Some sprinkle stuff. Some of these cinnamon rolls. Just whatever makes sense.”

      You gotta see it from their perspective, they’re CEOs (presumably) and aren’t used to knowing the details. They just vaguely point in vague directions (“pitch”) and let the employees figure out the rest.

  • Grunt4019@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    “I’m JD Vance I’m running for vice president,” Vance said. “Good to see you.”

    The employee sounds unmoved and replies with “okay” and waits for him to begin his order.

    Does he expect people to get down on their knees after he tells them that?

    • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      3 months ago

      The “OK” crushed him. He was expecting any reaction and she could give 2 shits about him. Order your donuts and get the fuck out, ain’t nobody got time for your ass.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Imagine if she had a zinger loaded. “Yeah, you’re the running mate for ‘America’s Hitler.’”

        Actually they probably got a bunch of reactions like that and “ok” was the one person that put him in the best light.

        • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          Simplicity is better in most cases. When someone has to tell you who they are and you respond “ok”. That is brutal. You are literally saying I don’t give a fuck

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    He must not have anyone competent on his staff if this happens. Usually they send people ahead to check to see if the people working there want to be on camera and talk

    • capital_sniff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      3 months ago

      Maybe they did and this was the most acceptable place. I imagine most decent restaurants have rules about fornicating with the furniture, so it really limits your options when you are a known couch fucker.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        3 months ago

        To be fair he’s the Heritage Foundation’s guy to make sure that a Trump Administration actually gets Project 2025 work done. I forget what position he previously held with the Heritage Foundation but its pretty dang obvious that’s the whole point of selecting him for Trump’s VP

        • Snapz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Heritage Foundation people were woven throughout the previous admin and the Supreme Court, and would be in a second admin, but vance is there as peter thiel’s lapdog and surrogate. He’s there to make sure that private equity and certain tech figures (like musk) are protected and taken care of. Thiel is also good friends with Ann coulter to the point that she dedicated a book to him (which should LOUDLY tell you something).

  • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    “One dozen glazed, one dozen assorted”.

    It’s not that hard, damn.

    And props to the employee refusing to be used as a prop for this couch molester.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    not the focus of ths video but along with many appearances, I’ve never heard him laugh like a human being.

    are you fucking kidding me, making fun of Harris laughing when this guy’s mouth does what i can only assume is an arcane incantation meant to awaken elder horrors from their timeless slumber?

    • orbitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Isn’t it weird the Republican nominees don’t laugh like most people?I haven’t watched much of Vance to notice this but since they’re ragging on Harris for laughing I bet that’s a big bullet point to avoid when he’s in public.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        3 months ago

        Emotions are difficult for them outside of fear and anger over “everything wrong with this country”. They don’t like public display of emotion, as evidenced by their sharp criticism of Walz’ son Gus crying at the convention. They do seem pretty happy to inflict suffering where they can.

        • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          3 months ago

          I actually don’t think I’ve seen Vance express what seemed to be one single genuine emotion. Even his “anger” feels and sounds manufactured. The one time I felt anything genuine from him was when he was telling the story about how he told his son to shut the hell up about pokemon

      • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 months ago

        Isn’t it weird the Republican nominees don’t laugh like most people?

        It’s because they’re sociopaths, but not the well adjusted kind that can blend into society.

        • Snapz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          More than 50% of republicans have begun an address to a crowd/reporter with, “Look, we all kill dogs sometimes…”

      • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        Has tRump ever laughed? I can’t recall ever seeing a clip of him laughing. I bet when he does, it’s to something horrible happening to women & children

        • booly@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          3 months ago

          something horrible happening to women & children

          The closest I’ve seen to genuine happiness is the video of him laughing with Jeffrey Epstein, so yeah, that checks out.

        • orbitz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 months ago

          He punches down in his ‘jokes’, and laughs at other people’s misery rather than when it’s in good humour. How anyone can vote for a politician that can’t laugh at themselves let alone a good joke is a mystery to me.

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    3 months ago

    If angels existed, they would each and every one weep tears of joy when she said, “…okay.”

  • Emerald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    We need a Tim Walz donut shop clip with the consent of all the employees being filmed

  • Mister Neon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    3 months ago

    The only thing he could make conversation about was how old the business was and how long they worked at the donut shop. Aren’t politicians supposed to be charismatic?

  • N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Vance is the embodiment of cringe. He’s been hanging out in Silicon Valley with Peter Thiel for so long that he’s forgotten how to even pretend to be a normal person.

    • frunch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Exactly! Don’t turn off the cameras, just audibly proclaim the footage will be edited not to include her.

      …So anyway, here’s the footage including her