Would Starlink and other satellite ISP’s be able to mitigate some of the traffic?

    • Kiwi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think you’re greatly underestimating how many non large corporations just host their shit in US-East 1.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Wouldn’t you think video streaming would be the first to go? Also music and podcasts. First in line is critical things like banking, credit cards, etc. It’s actually convenient that the most important things are the smallest data size. The problem I see is that so many companies are putting everything on the cloud.

      • assembly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 months ago

        You have to remember that the cloud is just a series of data centers owned by cloud providers. If you are Netflix, you’re not hosting Stranger Things for audiences in the US from the EU. You have a copy of it in both places and leverage AWS regions in each area to server geographically closer users (it’s typically called latency based routing). If the undersea cables are cut, the EU still watches Netflix because the content doesn’t need to travel undersea, it’s already in the EU, same thing in the US. The challenge comes in at the end of the month when people pay their Netflix bills and the banks needs to process international payments. End users are largely not impacted by direct service outages but big companies are.