Threads deepens its ties to the open social web, aka the 'fediverse' | TechCrunch
techcrunch.com
Meta announced Wednesday that users on Threads will be able to see fediverse replies on other posts besides their own.

“Threads is deepening its ties to the fediverse, also known as the open social web, which powers services like X alternative Mastodon, Pixelfed, PeerTube, Flipboard and other apps. On Wednesday, Meta announced that users on Threads will be able to see fediverse replies on other posts besides their own. In addition, posts that originated through the Threads API, like those created via third-party apps and scheduling services, will now be syndicated to the fediverse. The latter had previously been announced via an in-app message informing users that API posts would be shared to the fediverse starting on August 28.”

  • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    114·
    3 months ago

    Defedding from threads always seems strange to me. Everyone says it’s to protect your data from meta. But they can already get your data. Everything on the fediverse is public. They already have your data.

    • fin@sh.itjust.works
      82·
      3 months ago

      It’s not about the data, but the community. Just like how Google killed IRC, big techs are always trying to embrace, extend and extinguish the services.

    • heluecht@pirati.ca
      4·
      3 months ago

      @Dirk @MrScottyTay Also I think that one should ask the question, what Meta could do with the data and what it is doing with the data of their users. For their users they use the usage data to present them a feed that the users appreciate. Also they use it to place ads inside of their apps. Also they use the data to serve you ads outside of their system on ad networks that use data from Meta.

      All of this is technically not possible for Fediverse users.

    • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.devEnglish
      21·
      3 months ago

      Public is not the same as public domain.

      I’m not a lawyer, but Federation would probably imply consent to sharing the data. Whereas defederation would strongly imply you’re not okay with sharing the data with that entity.

      • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        3·
        3 months ago

        You think they don’t collect data illegally and anonymise it (but keep cohorts) for market research already? You sweet summer child

        • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.devEnglish
          32·
          3 months ago

          What I think or what they “may” do is irrelevant regarding public data. What matters is sending a clear signal what you are and are not okay with.

          Whether you actively participate in helping them get your data or not might not effectively matter in them acquiring it, but it may heavily impact the fine they get for it afterwards. You might be okay with them getting your data for free, but I’m not, sweet summer child.