yeah, rotten tomatoes actually verifies audience scores now, and only chuds are buying tickets to this movie, so its ridiculously skewed. only boomers actually review stuff on RT anyway
rotten tomatoes is a mostly useless website and it’s funny to me how people compare the critic and audience scores as if it means something
the audience score exists solely for chud confirmation bias at this point. like how many people even have an account on RT (other than right-wing trolls)? most people who actually like watching and reviewing movies use letterboxd
19% critic score and 98% audience score. clearly this means the film is a masterpiece and critics are simply too woke
I think most audience that wanted to see it came for the clapter value to begin with and other people didn’t bother to review it.
It’s “God is Not Dead” for… basically the same fucking demographic, really.
yeah, rotten tomatoes actually verifies audience scores now, and only chuds are buying tickets to this movie, so its ridiculously skewed. only boomers actually review stuff on RT anyway
rotten tomatoes is a mostly useless website and it’s funny to me how people compare the critic and audience scores as if it means something
Chuds tend to see any difference between critic reviews and audience reviews as a sign of the DEI/woke/SJW cabal out to get them.
the audience score exists solely for chud confirmation bias at this point. like how many people even have an account on RT (other than right-wing trolls)? most people who actually like watching and reviewing movies use letterboxd