https://futurism.com/the-byte/government-ai-worse-summarizing

The upshot: these AI summaries were so bad that the assessors agreed that using them could require more work down the line, because of the amount of fact-checking they require. If that’s the case, then the purported upsides of using the technology — cost-cutting and time-saving — are seriously called into question.

  • DPRK_Chopra [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 days ago

    Okay, sure. Like this?

    Honestly, I could have used nicer words. I just realized maybe I was subconsciously kinda picking on you with my brusque language earlier because you’re so abrasive. I need to examine why I did that and try to grow from it, and also maybe just not engage on this topic here, as it’s too upsetting for you. lmao

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Okay, sure. Like this?

      Honestly, I could have used nicer words. I just realized maybe I was subconsciously kinda picking on you with my brusque language earlier because you’re so abrasive.

      Yeah, it’s not working. You never stopped doing it and you’re trying to blame it on me.

      Believe whatever you want to believe about marketing hype calling large language models “AI” as it has for the last few years, no matter the blurring effect that that sloppy hype branding has already done to actual artificial intelligence research.

      I’m done.