like you go to the not-believing-until-seeing convention with lies and what? expect to get away with it?

  • msage@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fuck capitalism!

    We need housing and food for everyone, then we can all chill out and focus on advancing further.

    This hamster wheel of shit is going to kill us all.

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        With their bootstraps! And hustle! And so much work that they do 10 days a week!

    • Redruth@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Uhhh… how will you get that food into childrens mouths before it spoils? how will you store it? also, people have always built their home. are you saying it should be given? thats not very dignified.

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Dignified?

        There is a housing crisis in every developed country, millions of people are homeless while there are multiple times more empty units just because ‘investments’.

        Where is dignity in that?

        And for food, we need to support local produce, ideally something like hydroponics, so we can sustain everyone for as little work as possible, leaving the option to pursue better options at their leisure.

        • Redruth@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          ok. so you definitely want someone else to provide a bunch of housing, free or cheap. I suppose you’d like that with hot water on tap, flushing toilets, a/c during summer and heat during winter because “muh human dignity”. amirite?

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Before I decide you’re cool or not you have to pass a test.

      How do you feel about NATO?

      • killingspark@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not the person you asked but I’m interested if I’m passing the vibe check

        I hate that NATO exists, but I see that it has currently a purpose because other forces would and did overpower countries that aren’t included in a military alliance with mutual support obligations.

        I want NATO to be a thing of the past as soon as possible but that doesn’t mean dismantle it and be helpless again. It means we need to get rid of the need for a NATO.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Based. We need more NATO members, except Turkey cause fuck Turkey trade them for the Armenians. I also aint much of a fan of Hungary.

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Simple - does anything threaten the housing and food? If yes, can NATO stop it? If yes, then yay NATO. Any other case? No thank you.

        Demilitarizing the world won’t happen in a night, but we all know NATO won’t agree to it, so it will have to go eventually.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I would argue belligerent nations waging war on agricultural nations, for example Ukraine, is a threat to food and housing.

          • msage@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Well there we go!

            In ideal world, things like that would not be necessary, but as we know, asking countries to destroy their weapons never leads to their prosperity… so fuck that, too.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              I didn’t ask about Ideal world NATO, I asked about NATO which implies the context of reality we currently live in.

              • msage@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Did I not answer that question in my first comment? Wait - I did.

                I then tried to hint that (as my first comment actually started), we as species should try to build a better world, focusing on providing the minimum for everyone before giving very few everything there is.

                Is NATO perfect? No, it sucks, but we currently won’t do any better. Like nothing I keep repeating all over here.

                But I wish we stopped everything, and I mean everything apart from housing and basic food, to actually solve the climate crisis.

                And, ironic as it is, stopping everything would actually be the best thing right now.

                • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Building a better world involves unconditional support of mutual defence pacts such as NATO. Once you’ve eliminated the cause for NATO, then dissolving NATO will make sense. Building a better world without NATO just sounds like some Putin/CCP Cocksucking in the context of our reality.

                  • Preston Maness ☭@lemmygrad.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Once you’ve eliminated the cause for NATO, then dissolving NATO will make sense.

                    The cause for NATO was eliminated. NATO didn’t dissolve. It grew. Spoiler alert: there are no good guys in a war between imperialists.

                  • msage@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Yes yes yes, that is exactly what I mean the entire time, thank you for understanding it. We ALL should agree to forget losers, psychopaths, and everyone who want to have power over others, and focus on problems of the weakest ones first and foremost.