I think a little clarification is needed. No. I don’t actually think everyone there is insane. I don’t care about the bans so stop trying to use that. HB enthusiasts coming here and trying to call me out achieves nothing besides proving my point

Edit: Feel free to keep trying to brigade me. It’s not going to scare me to take this down

  • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    90
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Seeing the ban coming, they financed and suffered alpha and beta of the Lemmy platform we all enjoy. Then, they chose to become the most GLBTQ+ friendly destination on the internet.

    As it’s always been, they cope with the horrible events with satirical, sarcastic humor. And, in the middle of that will be a well-reasoned, nuanced, and quite serious post.

    But, perhaps the part I like most is the struggle sessions. The entire community will heavily focus on a current topic, then hash it out with good faith discussion.

    Their shit isn’t convenient or comfortable. It’s not easy to understand. And, I fucking love them for it.

    edit: Lazy coders need choose a randomized target value and timing or be a moderator to avoid detection by the user. Perceiving is easy when your code is trash. Ask for help from an industrial engineer.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      Their supposed support of LGBTQ+ is all for naught when they openly fawn after Stalin

      • flashgnash@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Honestly what is with the comrade/them shit they do about? I thought it was ironic like they were making fun of neopronouns or they were the 4chan people who popularised them in the first place

      • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        51
        ·
        3 months ago

        There’s much to learn from Stalin. But, advocating his authoritarian means is a bannable offense there just as they are in any meritable leftist forum. They tolerate a minority of revolutionaries ideologically leading the lumpen as it’s a historically very well-supoorted position. But, that doesn’t extend to physical force as that’s also a historically very well supported position.

        It’s much easier, convenient, and comfortable to demonized them than understand them. They even provided proactive assistance when many were deciding if they should defederate. They voted internally for defederation to defend their community from the medicrity of the masses.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          43
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          If not enjoying the image posts of young Stalin as some sort of brilliant maverick is mediocrity, well, so be it. They are clowns, and their beliefs structure is just like trump claiming he “loves the gays”

          • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            39
            ·
            3 months ago

            Young Stalin is where the good stuff is. It’s his implementation of those idealistic principles that’s unethical.

            The rest of what you’ve said is strawman. Most important is the implying that they’re all of one mind. Diversity of ideology is perhaps their greatest strength.

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              33
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              🥱

              Literally out here defending Stalin stans

              • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                35
                ·
                3 months ago

                Ad hominem is literally the best you had when confronted with facts that didn’t fit the shallow narrative you chose.

                • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  21
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  The “facts” are things we both agreed are posted there. That’s all I need. If they’re a stalin apologist / stan then the shows over.

                  • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    arrow-down
                    22
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Probably also wrote off the Bible due to the implementation of the followers. That’s too bad.

    • would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      But, perhaps the part I like most is the struggle sessions. The entire community will heavily focus on a current topic, then hash it out with good faith discussion.

      I’ve never seen this - not just from that instance, but literally anywhere on the internet, even back in the forum or bb days. But I’ve been looking for something like that for years, and I’d be interested. Do you know of any specific examples of this happening?

      • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        The best example I’ve experienced online is hexbear’s process to derive forum ruleset with respect to their minority of GLBTQ+. The consensus was that many understood and that those that did not would follow in faith, assuming that they would soon understand. The second best online example was the GME subreddits’ cultural response to initial scaling. The consensus was that each should individually choose and the collective’s purpose was to educate, this strengthening individual wisdom.

        But, my guidance would be to first pursue such things in real life. A leftist’s best work is almost always grassroots local.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Notable struggle sessions:

        Pronouns End result: Transphobes outed themselves and were purged)

        Veganism End result: Vegans who couldn’t stop stoking the fire and anti-vegans who wouldn’t stop trolling or using indigenous people as a shield were purged, CWs were required for meat, vegans generally chilled out

        Stacking rocks End result: White guys using indigenous tribes they aren’t a part of as a shield were heavily mocked)

        Outdoor Cats End result: outdoor cats bad

        AES countries End result: For each country, there are/have been significant issues, but nearly every western criticism is worthless for understanding them due to being false or lacking the historical context.

      • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        I also haven’t seen this but it seems to make fun of the authoritarian excesses in Mao’s China (struggle session).

        The Three Body Problem show features this, leading a character to go mad and wanting to destroy humanity.

        The funny thing is that this post is sort of a struggle session, an attempt to build consensus against socialists.

    • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah they kept being able to back the most ridiculous claims and then suddenly I was like “oh no they were right all along” and got radicalized 🤷

          • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s the whole point of an echo chamber yes. You can say whatever you want without being challenged by other viewpoints and make anything seem plausible.

            • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              22
              arrow-down
              22
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              but they are linking a lot of outside sources. That’s what I mean by “backing their claims up”, studies about covid, about the ukraine war, about Israel, it’s not just someone making a claim and then everyone is nodding along.

              What I am saying is they were able to completely upend the way I see the world and you just can’t do that by claiming thengs and linking to some other claims you make.

              • AmidFuror@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                17
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                3 months ago

                Wait until you hear about Scientology! Not the criticism from haters but the really mindbending stuff they have figured out.

                  • OpenStars@discuss.online
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    arrow-down
                    9
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    If you’ve heard of Chapo Trap House that’s them.

                    You seem to have lost the thread of this conversation, but this is how it started. Hexbear admins and mods definitely control who is allowed to post in Chapo Trap House, and related communities such as the_dunk_tank, even from instances other than Hexbear.net.

                • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  18
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I was on lemm.ee when I got radicalized, all my life Ive been exposed to people claiming all sorts of things. I was a pro-NATO pro-Ukraine anti-ussr anti-china average reddit lib that they were able to convince otherwise.

          • Kaboom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s surprisingly easy to backup horrible ideas, but that shouldn’t be your only concern. You also need to think about the morals and what happened last time it was tried.

            The ends do not justify the means. The means are the ends.

            • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              The last time what was tried? This sounds like historical “knowledge” derived from memes.

    • TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      i don’t think they really helped with the financing of lemmy, although their coders did/do make many valuable contributions to lemmy’s code base. out of curiosity, do you have an account on another instance? I’m surprised to see a sympathetic comment like this from an account on an instance that has them defederated

      • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t think they really helped with the financing

        All the computational resources the users tested the code base on must’ve been free.

        I’m surprised to see a sympathetic comment like this from an account on an instance that has them defederated

        Identity politics from .ml?

        If you’re surprised at such small acts of individual praxis, you’d be amazed at what we’ve accomplished in groups.

        • TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          All the computational resources the users tested the code base on must’ve been free.

          fair enough I just think of direct monetary donations or something when I see financing like that but looking at like that isn’t incorrect

          Identity politics from .ml?

          I mean kinda? I normally expect people who hold sympathies towards hexbear to use an account on like lemm.ee so they don’t have to use more than one account to browse everything they want to see

          • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            when I see financing like that but looking at like that isn’t incorrect

            None of the devs got paid. There are no other expenses.

            I normally expect people who hold sympathies towards hexbear to use an account on like lemm.ee so they don’t have to use more than one account to browse everything they want to see

            You expect the convenient implementation of MLK’s white moderate. But, my content should give no indication of that stereotype.

            I’ll answer your previous question: I’ve personal accounts on world, ee, ml, and hexbear. The fediverse doesn’t limit viewing content from multiple accounts concurrently. One must only choose an account to post. The only obstacle to such a tool is a means to avoid burdening the fediverse with duplicate responses to content requests. We solved that problem in a few hours.

            If you want actual insight communicated properly then you should ask in the correct venue. For example, I’d have no issue explaining in nuance on hexbear because the majority has a strong understanding or conversion of theory to praxis. I’m not even needed. Others would adequately explain on my behalf.

            • TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I think my comments have been too ambiguous then, I didn’t mean for anything I’ve said to come across as hostile in any way, I apologize. I’m a lemmygrad user, made this account because I browse through .ml at work and been meaning to make one so i can comment while there.

              • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’ve perceived only good faith from your posts. I apologize if I’ve not demonstrated that in my responses. It’s difficult to do here.

                  • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Based on this interaction I’ve realized my perception of lemmygrad is hypocritical: My experience indicates that our shallow, automated and wide scope language analysis likely isn’t human truth. I’ve decided to spend more time there.

                    Thank you for risking good faith engagement when it’s not popular or politic. Iron sharpens iron.

      • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Hello, low effort neolib troll. Thanks for the opportunity to continue to speak truth.

        There’s a cultural similarity to what 4-chan was prior to the LOIC. But, they’re definitely not tankies. Sincere expressions of authoritarian means are soundly defeated and usually result in permabans. The principle and practice is consistent for MAGA, neolibs, and other authoritarians.