She should take the opportunity to debate an empty podium. (Mostly kidding, because when Eastwood “debated” an empty chair, he just seemed senile and silly.)
But I do think the country needs to see Tim Walz give a good schooling to JD Vance.
I think the country seeing more of those two would really sway votes the way I’d prefer. So I’m biased.
But gov Walz represents as very genuine and honest and caring, and the more we can see some of that on our TVs the more we can believe that a most-good-soonest kind of administration is an option.
Look. They could lose. Or Harris and Walz could be faking, even if I don’t think so (or want to think so). Or gopnik fearmongering could be right and they could only be barely better than a Dump/Chance ticket.
Just give us this. We haven’t had positivity and hope since prez Obama and the hope of Change[TM].
Now, as I haven’t suggested everyone boycott for one particular single issue or another, I expect downvotes right to hell. So be it.
She should take the opportunity to debate an empty podium. (Mostly kidding, because when Eastwood “debated” an empty chair, he just seemed senile and silly.)
A whole debate with that would be silly. She could turn it into a town hall style discussion and run commercials with her debating and “waiting” on donald. He could be scared somewhere with a blankie.
Look at the debate from the start. His slow ass could barely make it to his podium before she was their to shake his hand. She was fast, confident, and looked strong to me. Donald looked like he was huffing to the stage.
She should take the opportunity to debate an empty podium. (Mostly kidding, because when Eastwood “debated” an empty chair, he just seemed senile and silly.)
But I do think the country needs to see Tim Walz give a good schooling to JD Vance.
Trump wasn’t going to say anything coherent anyway. Just stick Alec Baldwin up there and have him read AI generated nonsense.
Mr Conductor! No!
snorts cocaine
Fuck yeah, sparkle sparkle sparkle!
How about just a giant cardboard cut out with a button when pressed, just gives a random 30 second ramble from him.
It would honestly be good criticism since it would functionally be the same.
I think the country seeing more of those two would really sway votes the way I’d prefer. So I’m biased.
But gov Walz represents as very genuine and honest and caring, and the more we can see some of that on our TVs the more we can believe that a most-good-soonest kind of administration is an option.
Look. They could lose. Or Harris and Walz could be faking, even if I don’t think so (or want to think so). Or gopnik fearmongering could be right and they could only be barely better than a Dump/Chance ticket.
Just give us this. We haven’t had positivity and hope since prez Obama and the hope of Change[TM].
Now, as I haven’t suggested everyone boycott for one particular single issue or another, I expect downvotes right to hell. So be it.
Waltz is the guy you want to be your dad, your uncle, your coach, or just the highly respected friend at the bar.
We need more of him. Clone him, someone.
It won’t change a single vote.
It will only change the way they say they voted.
It’s just like 2016 before the election, everyone is a devout libertarian, sticking by their principles.
Speaking of voter fraud, did you know nobody voted for Bush in 2004? Everyone you ask says they didn’t now, weird huh?
A whole debate with that would be silly. She could turn it into a town hall style discussion and run commercials with her debating and “waiting” on donald. He could be scared somewhere with a blankie.
Look at the debate from the start. His slow ass could barely make it to his podium before she was their to shake his hand. She was fast, confident, and looked strong to me. Donald looked like he was huffing to the stage.
Or a handbag
https://www.radiotimes.com/tv/entertainment/nicky-morgan-is-replaced-by-a-handbag-on-have-i-got-news-for-you/