Coming back to check how soundly this statement was beaten into oblivion will forever make me smile.
Wow, so you are happy engaging in namecalling. That says way more about you than it does me.
If you enjoy making fun of people, then you are definitely in the right place. Enjoy.
The fact that you enjoy it so much, actually tells me that my guess about you was right. I think you’re the one spreading misinformation and doubt and that maybe you aren’t even voting Democrat. I think I know which side you’re on. Your actions are proving it.
And you also seem to care way more about upvotes and downvotes than I ever have or will ever do. lol
I stand by what I said about namecalling. Proudly. :)
You lost all credibility when you started namecalling. Try disagreeing without namecalling.
When someone is so reprehensible, being an obvious traitor to her country for a few rubles, is put in their place I do find joy. Some people deserve much worse but insults are the only real recourse.
I only care about up-votes in this case because it objectively proves you wrong about discrediting which means your predictable burying your head in the sand patently won’t work (Hence your spiral into salty hostility). Sorry friend, but beating your chest and crying “I’m right!” won’t work when it’s prefaced by a big red numeral “f you, you’re wrong”. :)
Tell you what. Let’s make a bet. Whomever has the greater amount of net votes between the 2 posts above by the end of this Sunday vows to stop posting in this community until after the election.
Edit: We’ll get a mod on the actual server to make the call.
I didn’t say he called me names. But he called Jill Stein, “Putin’s Jizz Stein.” What “evidence” is there to call her Jizz Stein? That’s name-calling, friend. And uncalled for.
One can produce “evidence” and an argument, without resorting to name-calling. I stand by what I said. Thank you!
So by doubling down are you willing to actually stand by it and take the bet? Tell you what. I’m so confident you’re wrong that I’ll give you an hour from the posting of this to craft a full on dissertation on why you think Stein is teh best candidate. You can edit your first reply to that dissertation, I’ll screenshot it and put it in here to make it concrete and official and we’ll let the 2 posts see who wins the credibility contest.
You willing to stand by your opinion or are you just bluster?
You lost all credibility when you said that. Try disagreeing without namecalling.
Coming back to check how soundly this statement was beaten into oblivion will forever make me smile.
Wow, so you are happy engaging in namecalling. That says way more about you than it does me.
If you enjoy making fun of people, then you are definitely in the right place. Enjoy.
The fact that you enjoy it so much, actually tells me that my guess about you was right. I think you’re the one spreading misinformation and doubt and that maybe you aren’t even voting Democrat. I think I know which side you’re on. Your actions are proving it.
And you also seem to care way more about upvotes and downvotes than I ever have or will ever do. lol
I stand by what I said about namecalling. Proudly. :)
You lost all credibility when you started namecalling. Try disagreeing without namecalling.
When someone is so reprehensible, being an obvious traitor to her country for a few rubles, is put in their place I do find joy. Some people deserve much worse but insults are the only real recourse.
I only care about up-votes in this case because it objectively proves you wrong about discrediting which means your predictable burying your head in the sand patently won’t work (Hence your spiral into salty hostility). Sorry friend, but beating your chest and crying “I’m right!” won’t work when it’s prefaced by a big red numeral “f you, you’re wrong”. :)
I don’t have to explain anything to you. Thanks!
Tell you what. Let’s make a bet. Whomever has the greater amount of net votes between the 2 posts above by the end of this Sunday vows to stop posting in this community until after the election.
Edit: We’ll get a mod on the actual server to make the call.
You lose all credibility when you say things like that. Try disagreeing without name-calling.
He followed up with evidence, and you’re crying about name calling, which wasn’t even towards you. Disingenuous as usual.
I didn’t say he called me names. But he called Jill Stein, “Putin’s Jizz Stein.” What “evidence” is there to call her Jizz Stein? That’s name-calling, friend. And uncalled for.
One can produce “evidence” and an argument, without resorting to name-calling. I stand by what I said. Thank you!
So by doubling down are you willing to actually stand by it and take the bet? Tell you what. I’m so confident you’re wrong that I’ll give you an hour from the posting of this to craft a full on dissertation on why you think Stein is teh best candidate. You can edit your first reply to that dissertation, I’ll screenshot it and put it in here to make it concrete and official and we’ll let the 2 posts see who wins the credibility contest.
You willing to stand by your opinion or are you just bluster?
I’m not even voting for Jill Stein, friend.
Also, I don’t have to explain myself to you at all. About anything.
You lose all credibility when you say things like, “Putin’s Jizz Stein.” Try disagreeing without name-calling.
Seeing as we’re friends, I’ll share with you my favourite Shakespear quote:
“Cowards die many times before their deaths. The brave taste of death but once.” (Julius Caesar, Act 2 Scene 2)
Tell that to all* the voters who claim they would vote for someone else, “but can’t let tfg win!”
Cool story, bro. I don’t have to explain myself to you at all.
And I’m not even voting for Jill Stein.
This you?
Seeing as Stein has no credibility herself it all evens out.
And I noticed you were able to easily say that without resorting to name-calling. Unlike the other poster. :)