Most of us don’t eat as much fruit and veggies as we know we should, but that goal might now be a bit more achievable. Scientists in Spain have engineered a new “Golden Lettuce” with 30 times more nutrients than the regular green stuff.
Designed for third world countries with actual issues of underconsumption of Beta-Carotine, it got regulated away by first world countries who went “ew icky GMO”
To be technical it was first world companies exploiting the uneducated in those 3rd world countries into asking for suppressive regulations, which their lawmakers then abided by.
The actual point of the GMO crops is that it’s patentable. The local farmers objected because Monsanto, yes, that Monsanto, was going to charge them fucking royalties.
Now, Monsanto did, at one point, offer to let researchers develop GMO crops without paying their fees.
FYI in the U.S. you can get a utility patent on any variety. Its not specific to the GMO. Patents differ from regular PVP (plant variety protection) in that they restrict others using it in breeding efforts.
The major difference is varieties are not patentable in the EU but GMO are.
Of course the varieties were intended for countries that do not enforce U.S. or E.U. intellectual property laws anyways. So it was not possible for Monsanto to collect royalties on golden rice in the target market.
That announcement was them trying to put a positive marketing spin on it. “Oh we won’t attempt to seek royalties on a product in countries we can’t collect royalties in…”
Also last time i checked, golden rice had lower yields than other varieties so it still needs years of breeding to be competitive. And needless to say, the real solution to these nutrition problems is economic development, which won’t happen with propietary crops.
Classic tech bro solutions without understanding the real problem.
Yet, malnutrition is prevalent, particularly among children and women. This is not simply because of the absence of an important nutrient or vitamin. It is caused by the “lack of access to sufficient, nutritious and safe food” due to poverty, and changing food production and consumption patterns (p. 27, UN FAO, 2017).
Golden rice was the same thing, wasn’t it?
Designed for third world countries with actual issues of underconsumption of Beta-Carotine, it got regulated away by first world countries who went “ew icky GMO”
To be technical it was first world companies exploiting the uneducated in those 3rd world countries into asking for suppressive regulations, which their lawmakers then abided by.
Look up Greenpeace actions against Golden Rice. It’s an example of how misplaced ideology literally kills millions of people.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/10/17/golden-rice-genetically-modified-superfood-almost-saved-millions/
Oh they have also have made GMO rice with folic acid.
The actual point of the GMO crops is that it’s patentable. The local farmers objected because Monsanto, yes, that Monsanto, was going to charge them fucking royalties.
Now, Monsanto did, at one point, offer to let researchers develop GMO crops without paying their fees.
https://www.science.org/content/article/monsanto-waives-fees-golden-rice
And for some of their actual perspectives:
https://grain.org/en/article/6516-why-we-oppose-golden-rice
FYI in the U.S. you can get a utility patent on any variety. Its not specific to the GMO. Patents differ from regular PVP (plant variety protection) in that they restrict others using it in breeding efforts.
The major difference is varieties are not patentable in the EU but GMO are.
Of course the varieties were intended for countries that do not enforce U.S. or E.U. intellectual property laws anyways. So it was not possible for Monsanto to collect royalties on golden rice in the target market.
That announcement was them trying to put a positive marketing spin on it. “Oh we won’t attempt to seek royalties on a product in countries we can’t collect royalties in…”
Also last time i checked, golden rice had lower yields than other varieties so it still needs years of breeding to be competitive. And needless to say, the real solution to these nutrition problems is economic development, which won’t happen with propietary crops.
Classic tech bro solutions without understanding the real problem.
quoted from the grain.org article you postes.