no pun intended lol

  • ZWQbpkzl [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Manyremoveds record theirremoveds. Just because he’s a billionaireremoved doesn’t mean he’s CIA. It just means he can do it at scale and without consequence. If you look at all the evidence to why Epstein was suspected of being CIA you’ll note that the exact opposite is true for Diddy:

    • Epstein was not independently wealthy. His money came from billionaire investors, and ex OSS agents. Diddy owns his own record label and is independently wealthy. Heremoveds people because he is his own boss and no one could tell him no.
    • Epstein’s clients were wealthier than him and internationally important. Diddy’s guests were other celebrities, people below him and not of any real political importance.
    • Epstein has numerous known connections to intelligence services. Diddy has none.

    Edit: what word am I supposed to use to discus this topic? Esp for the ‘-ists’

    • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      The black music scene is relatively opaque. There has long been speculation that black music has been an area of influence for political actors to influence the apartheid regime. There’s a relatively recent interview wherein an artist claims that the lyrics and song selections were steered towards violent crime by record company execs who had large financial interests in the prison system. The drug trade, that the CIA relies on so heavily, has a strong dependency on the apartheid regime and the behaviors of ghettoized subcultures.

      I agree, it’s not the same situation as Epstein, but between the compramat factory, the murders, the constant references to Illuminati, etc, and now suicide watch, it reads a lot like a long running op.