The group representing voters frustrated by the administration's policies on Gaza says Harris has made it “impossible” to endorse her.
  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldEnglish
    21·
    1 hour ago

    It’s a two party system. Doing anything else but voting for Harris is helping donnie, which is only going to make the situation in Gaza even worse if he wins.

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    14·
    2 hours ago

    Showing that good democrat stick-to-it-iveness that we all know and love.

    I’m voting psl in November and so can you.

  • g0nz0li0@lemmy.world
    89·
    20 hours ago

    We must block Donald Trump, which is why we urge Uncommitted voters to vote against him and avoid third-party candidates that could inadvertently boost his chances

    Isn’t this just saying vote for Harris?

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      142·
      11 hours ago

      It’s a way to reframe the argument from a vote FOR a milquetoast candidate, to one AGAINST a would-be Dictator.

      Know that none of the 3 possible options for voters will immediately stop Israel’s current terror campaign on Palestinians and the Lebanese.

      Instead, all it does is set up the future environment and Government whom you can influence the actions of. Only ONE option provides an opportunity which could reign Israel back in, and it sure as shit isn’t a possible 2nd Trump administration.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        22·
        14 hours ago

        I guess what they’re trying to say is “We do not endorse this candidate, she doesn’t represent our views, but you need to vote for her anyway because that’s the only choice that will prevent a far worse outcome.”

        But if that’s so, I feel like they probably should have just said it, instead of dancing around the point like this.

    • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      13·
      19 hours ago

      Yes, but I imagine the roundabout is to maintain pressure.

      I want Kamala to win but I also want her to fix the fucking gaza problem, and she can’t be allowed to forget that.

  • slimarev92@lemmy.world
    461·
    19 hours ago

    They recommended not to vote for a third party candidate and vote for someone else who can block Trump. I wonder who they person could be 🤔

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          71·
          5 hours ago

          The one that the neo-Nazis don’t like. You know exactly what the fuck I’m talking about.

          Stop pushing that false equivalence bullshit.

              • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
                29·
                4 hours ago

                What am I spoiling? Either my candidate wins or one of the ethnic cleansing candidates wins. (I’m against ethnic cleansing)

                • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
                  31·
                  2 hours ago

                  Your actions suggest you’re interested in acting like you’re against it rather than stopping it

                • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
                  31·
                  4 hours ago

                  Tell me you don’t understand the influence AIPAC wields in American politics without telling me you don’t understand the influence AIPAC wields in American politics

                  Pull your head out of your ass. Harris has to tread carefully if she doesn’t want AIPAC to give a dump truck of money to Trump. Moreover, she has ZERO official capacity to define or enact international policy as the VP. And voting 3p increases the chance that Trump wins, and his idea of a “final solution” in Gaza will be a lot fucking closer to Bibi’s than a two-state solution, let alone a halt to the violence and apartheid. Trump’s likely to send a squadron of B-52s to Gaza and the West Bank to reduce them to rubble, then break ground on a new beachfront Trump Tower Gaza with a special land grant from Bibi.

                  But sure; ignore the context. Be part of the group that helps to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Let the fascists win. What could possibly fucking go wrong.