If you’ve not seen the new Dandy Warhol’s video it’s incredible.
I thought slop was what you feed pigs.
One of my favorite obsolete usages is slop for a jacket or outerwear, derived from middle English but kept alive in the nautical vernacular for some time after.
this is already a classic
I’ve commented about this before, but I do actually miss those first few generations of image generators. The first DeepDream style stuff was interesting but didn’t go very far, but this image in particular is a milestone for what came directly after.
I would love to run VQGAN+CLIP locally, for example, in some efficient way. It was fun to play with and to see how the model interpreted the input. And it wasn’t as scary as the tools we have now (especially when those are paired with the deep fake face swap stuff, for example)
I genuinely think slop is the perfect word for the current iteration of these image generators, both the image outputs themselves and the role they’re playing in the already-bleak digital media landscape.
See, that’s an actual thought provoking piece on the nature of human perception so you can argue it’s an actual work of art.
I will mock AI “art” until my dying breath.
As we all should.
https://simonwillison.net/2024/May/8/slop/
Watching in real time as “slop” becomes a term of art. the way that “spam” became the term for unwanted emails, “slop” is going in the dictionary as the term for unwanted AI generated content
TIL
But there is no “spam-core” aesthetic
Well, there is James Veitch and similar comedians turning spam into part of their art.
Sure there is, it’s the weirdos who print out emails (or print literally everything).
This is most likely an error in space-time.
Wasnt “slop” used before AI to describe something bad and masse produced on the internet?
Not even the internet specifically, but often media in general. It comes from the use of “slop” as the mix of garbage that you pour into a feeding trough for pigs. Basically junk that companies think people will gobble up regardless of the quality.
