so a common claim I see made is that arch is up to date than Debian but harder to maintain and easier to break. Is there a good sort of middle ground distro between the reliability of Debian and the up-to-date packages of arch?

  • Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    You are the meme

    1000004627

    They were not asking about immutable Linux…

    • Lupec@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Atomic distros are still distros, op never excluded that particular kind