• ecoenginefutures@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean, they might be against it for the wrong reasons, but it would be better if we tried to fix the climate without aerosol…

    • hotelbravo722@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Agreed geoengineering is bad science/engineering IMO. You can’t know what the long term effects would be until after its been deployed. The safest bet would be to just ditch fossil fuels but that’s not as sexy.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Also, we already have examples of tech bros creating a business where companies pay them to offset their carbon footprint by shooting unknown chemicals of unknown quantities into the upper atmosphere.

  • theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    They’re trying to make this the new recycling aren’t they… Pitching an idea that seemingly would work, and feels like we’re doing something without actually addressing the problem

    When the media starts over focusing on something odd, it’s because billionaires have an agenda