And in “tell Us Something we Didn’t Already Know” news.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Green” and “pro nuclear” go together like peas and carrots. Unless one flunked elementary school science class.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Nah nuclear is relatively easy to deal with the waste, ublike say oil. Plus ignoring it is a legit method of dealing with the problem, worst case ya dump it in Wyoming nobody lives in Wyoming.

      • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Honestly though! Look at the region around Pripyat; that place is thriving.

        Alternatively we could stash it in death valley where literally nothing lives, not even animals.

        Stash, not drop: As nuclear technology progresses, we’ll get more efficient at using it as fuel and eventually the waste of today can become supplemental fuel of tomorrow, used much more thoroughly, and only be radioactive for a few hundred years instead of thousands.