• Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    The Fascist or the at least slightly socially progressive neoliberals

    Neither are acceptable, both are genocidal regimes that are working towards WW3, Climate Collapse, and genocide. The only peaceful solution is voting third party, otherwise revolution is necessary. Taking the miniscule chance of a peaceful solution is morally correct, especially if we believe revolution to be necessary.

    • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      Meanwhile you “peacefully” increase the probability that the guy who destroyed women’s reproductive rights gets voted in again.

      I say you should help punish the Republicans for MAGA and once they try a moderate candidate again you can vote third party. But don’t ignore the consequences of your actions.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 month ago

        Meanwhile you “peacefully” increase the probability that the guy who destroyed women’s reproductive rights gets voted in again.

        Meanwhile you “peacefully” increase the probability that genocide continues, climate change continues to be ignored, and World War 3 kills us all.

        I say you should help punish the Republicans for MAGA and once they try a moderate candidate again you can vote third party. But don’t ignore the consequences of your actions.

        What do you think fascism is? Why do you think MAGA is just a random event and not a systemic problem? Fascism is Capitalism in decline, there will be no “moderate” candidates because Capitalism is still in decline. The conditions for fascism persist, so fascism persists, and the Dems get closer to fascism.

        • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m not doing anything like that, the will never be public support for a socialist candidate in the US without first changing the voting system.

          I wish it wasn’t like that but I’m convinced it is.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 month ago
            1. Why do you believe there will never be public support for a Socialist candidate in the US? Where do you believe people draw their ideas from? Is the US a static, unchanging system? We know this to be false, wealth disparity is rising, the climate is changing, it’s anything but static!

            2. The mainstream parties will never risk losing power intentionally, ergo there will be no change to the voting system.

            • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              1 month ago

              Because that’s how the spoiler effect works.The more support a leftist third party gets, the easier it is for the Republicans to win.

              I can’t tell you how to fix it, but I can tell you that an election with 10% Socialists, 40% Dems, and 50% Reps will scare people away from voting Socialists.

              At least as long as MAGA is a thing and the Dems aren’t seen as totally corrupt and basically the same as the Reps by the general public. And believe me: they aren’t.

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 month ago

                You didn’t answer my questions. Why do you believe the US is a closed, unchanging, static system? In order for any of your analysis to make any sense, it must be immovable with no trends in metrics, in perpetuity.

                Because that’s how the spoiler effect works.The more support a leftist third party gets, the easier it is for the Republicans to win.

                Not necessarily. Ideas change alongside the ever-changing material conditions.

                I can’t tell you how to fix it

                Evidently.

                but I can tell you that an election with 10% Socialists, 40% Dems, and 50% Reps will scare people away from voting Socialists.

                Why? Trends change over time.

                At least as long as MAGA is a thing

                It will be for as long as Capitalism exists, getting worse. Capitalism is declining, and fascism rises when Capitalism is in decay. Only Socialism will fix it, liberalism leads to more fascism. You can’t prevent MAGA by voting Dem, you strengthen it.

                and the Dems aren’t seen as totally corrupt and basically the same as the Reps by the general public

                This is increasingly proven to be true, public opinion of both parties is declining.

    • InputZero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      So I don’t have a hat in this race because I can not vote. I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding about how a government is formed in the United States. The odds of stopping a Democrat or Republican from not winning the 2024 presidential election are futile. If I could vote, but I can’t, if I voted third party I would be putting my effort into what I know is a futile effort. That seems morally the same as ignoring it because I know the results would be identical. The only moral option I would then have is to choose the least bad option. The most moral option would be off the table for me.

      Actually the president used to be less important than they seemed. The United States Supreme Court decision that president’s are practically kings changes a lot. The other side of this is that the president doesn’t really matter. The president really only executes the will of Congress. It seems to me that if you really wanted to do the moral thing, it would be changing the roots of the problem. Not a single branch. It’s the hearts and minds of grass roots organizationa you want to change long before anyone walks up to a polling booth.

      Just saying, as someone who can’t vote.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        First off, I understand how the electoral system works. The odds are incredibly slim that a third party will win. I disagree that a Democrat victory is acceptable, because the Democrats will only push for more genocide, failed climate action, and world war 3. It isn’t a matter of being “better or worse,” both result in the doom of humanity. Either we push to end that electorally, or via revolution.

        Organizing is also good, Claudia De La Crúz represents PSL, a party that does that more than try to win the presidency. They serve to highlight the sham of the election and gain recognition.

        • InputZero@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I wish I could tell you more because my area did that, we’ve done what we both agree is what needs to happen. We elected a third party candidate as our representative. Not as our president, that’s insane lol. Also I don’t know how what we did would apply to the United States other than just saying grass roots organizing. Saying even that much reveals more about me than I’m comfortable with online.

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      Drag is happy that you get to feel like you’re being peaceful, but sad that you’ve convinced yourself the way to do so is through apathy and inaction. Drag wonders if you’d feel the same way if you understood that choosing not to do a good thing is still choosing to do a bad thing.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Drag should not assume I am saying electoralism is the end all, be all of political action. I am advocating for organizing outside the electoral system as the primary role of leftists, and refusing to give the electoral system legitimacy. Voting Dem is not a “good thing,” because the Dems are unacceptable and will lead to genocide, world war 3, and failed climate action.

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 month ago

          Drag is confused. How does voting legimitise the electoral system? Drag mostly does direct action, but drag also votes.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            If voting for Democrats is seen as activism, then activism is oriented around voting for Democrats. Voting third party signals disapproval for the system in general and tells the public what views those in disapproval have.

            If Drag wants to do direct action, and believes it to be the path to systemic change, then voting for Democrats is counter-intuitive.

            • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 month ago

              Drag doesn’t get it. None of that sounds like practical, material effects. It just sounds like symbolic gestures. Drag wants to know if there’s any physical reasons not to vote, or just symbolic ones. Also drag is not a capitalised pronouns user, but drag is glad you’re willing to respect people with capitalised pronouns.

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                How is delegitimizing the electoral system by voting for leftist third parties not practical? If leftists continue to prop up right wing parties committing genocide, failing to address climate change adequately, and working towards World War 3, then that will be the status quo that is maintained. To get off of this train, leftists need to organize outside the bounds of electoralism, build up dual power, and signal strength with third party voting.

                The physical reason not to prop up the democrats is that the democrats are leading the US to the end of the world, just like the republicans, and legitimizing their rule makes leftist organizing more difficult.

                • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  That’s a circular argument. Drag asked you how voting props up the electoral system. You said “well how does propping up the electoral system help?” Drag agrees that propping up the electoral system is bad, but drag has not been told a reason that voting is that, except that it’s supposed to be a symbolic loss. Drag doesn’t care about symbolic losses, drag cares about stopping Trump from bombing the West Bank. Drag cares about Palestinian lives much more than symbolic complicity. Drag still wants to hear a practical reason why voting helps electoralism.

                  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    I never said voting props up the electoral system, I said voting for Democrats or Republicans props it up. Drag is arguing against ghosts.

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          You’re not talking the same as drag. Drag is using drag’s first person pronoun, you’re just saying your name.

            • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              Drag doesn’t know. Is explo explodicle’s person independent neopronoun? If so, drag will refer to explo by these neopronouns from now on. Drag is happy that explo has decided to experiment with a new gender presentation.