• dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sounds like you’re forgetting about the dot com bubble. The internet wasn’t fine abck then because nobody really had a sustainable business model.

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The dot com bubble made the Internet explode, sure, but corporate sites weren’t the entire internet back then. There were far more niche sites, web rings, forums, etc…

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The reason I mentioned the dot com bubble is because a lot of the companies back then failed because they couldn’t figure out a sustainable business model. It was mostly hype-driven with the idea of getting users first, then figuring out monetization later.

        That’s why we have ad-supported sites today. It was the main business model that was the most sustainable.

        There were a lot of small sites, sure, but a lot of them were hosted on services with no real business model. Even back then, not a lot of people self-hosted.

        • LWD@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s a fair thing to bring up. I think your point went over my head, because I was mostly reminiscing about how the less capital-oriented parts of the internet were relatively pleasant before companies like Facebook came along and encouraged them all (with their newly acquired capital) to jump into the big centralized areas.