• douglasg14b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Your take on urban density is wayyyyy off base and wrong.

    The deforestation being a result of agricultural expansion to support a growing population is spot on.


    Urban density increases the efficiency of logistics, you state it makes it worse. The cost-per-unit goes down as density goes up. Economies of scale apply here, logistics almost always becomes cheaper per unit the more of it you do. This applies to farming, transportation, processing, packaging…etc

    • pm_me_some_serotonin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Logistics are something too complex. Your statement makes me think you’re referring to a scenario with one source of a product and either one consumer area or several ones. In that cass, indeed, a more denser region would make it easier, but the scenario I described consists of production decentralized and closer to consumption, making logistics easier and cheaper, with fewer middlemen.

      But maybe I didn’t explain it all very well. I have a couple or articles bookmarked in my pc that I will link here when I have the chance.

      I just hope my memory isn’t playing tricks on me, because it so, it’s gonna be really shameful lol.