MARK SURMAN, PRESIDENT, MOZILLA Keeping the internet, and the content that makes it a vital and vibrant part of our global society, free and accessible has

    • d0ntpan1c@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’ve tried, notice how many of their products and services with a cost get shut down?

      Their power users are too picky for what they offer, and the normie users wouldn’t want a product the power users demand.

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        It sounds like a management issue. They keep frolicking around and not listening to the userbase. There is no reason other than management that Mozilla couldn’t be a profitable and sustainable company. They create some half baked thing no one asked for and then kill it off.

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s why you make enterprise products. Companies will continue to pay for services they don’t even use for years because nobody knows what it is or what it does.

      • lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        And then SimpleLogin comes, as just one example, and succeeds. Mozilla obviously messed up all their efforts, for one reason or another.

    • BlisterexeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      what products and services?

      Theyve tried that many times already

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Not really

        They create 100 random things no one wanted and then offered then mostly for free. They have a massive management problem. I think the biggest issue is how risk adverse they are. They don’t want to take big risks so they instead take a bunch of small useful risks that fail. They need to start something and then commit. Also baking more things into Firefox is not the way forward. They need stuff that is separate and useful.

        • BlisterexeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          they tried a bucnh of paid services, like their vpn, email alias and data broker remover.

          Do you think you can come up with a better idea?

          • LWD@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Why not ask the CEO of Mozilla? They’re paid to have all the smart ideas, allegedly.

          • Ants Are Everywhere@mathstodon.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            @Blisterexe @possiblylinux127

            #Mozilla Foundation can disband Mozilla Corporation if it’s not bringing in the revenue to justify a taxable subsidiary. Then they can decide which entity is best positioned to manage the Firefox code base and ensure that

            > The internet is a global public resource that must remain open and accessible.

            Instead, they’re abandoning their mission and destroying the public internet for a long shot at being the fourth or fifth place ad-infested browser.