• Ferrous@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    47
    ·
    6 hours ago

    How can you simultaneously claim that abortion was protected only by precedent, yet the democrats did everything in their power to preserve it?

    • SpaceBishop
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Oh you’re trying so hard to build a strawman! How adorable.

      Roe was established case law. Reproductive rights were settled. Blaming Democrats when the actions of Republicans baselessly dismissed it is moronic.

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 hours ago

          They have. In the seven states that have put abortion issues on the ballot since 2022, every single one has supported abortion, including red states: Montana, Kentucky, Kansas, and Ohio.

          10 states have abortion issues in their ballots this year. Abortion access is being picked up faster than “Constitutional Carry” did.

        • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          You may wish to observe that the Republicans have a majority in the House of Representatives, meaning the Democratic Caucus lacks the votes to reinstate it.

          • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            6 hours ago

            And, in states with Democratic majorities, they are codifying it at the state level. Sucks for the rest of us, though. I’m moving out of one of them for many reasons, but one important one is for my children.

            • kofe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Lots of red states are pushing for a vote on it and passing, too. It’s wild seeing “vote no on amendment 3” signs here in Missouri as if it’s not just advertising for the majority of us to show up and shut these chucklefucks up. I’m hoping that’s how it’ll go anyway 😓

              • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Crossing my fingers for you! I’m hoping that Harris and certain single issue referenda (like marijuana) will bring people to the polls and while they’re there, they’ll vote for women’s rights.

                • kofe@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Same! There’s some interesting measures on our ballot that I’m making videos on to raise awareness for like rank choice voting. If you know anyone from Missouri have them check out my YouTube or TikTok! Links are in my profile:)

                  • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 hours ago

                    That’s amazing! I will save this comment so that I can trace it back. I wish you (and the collective us) much success!

            • barsquid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 hours ago

              IDK how that would possibly happen with Manchin and Sinema in there. It seems easier to pass a federal law.

    • rsuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Logically, the answer would have to be that Democrats lack the power to preserve it. Which happens to be true because:

      1. Ordinary legislation would not be sufficient to overturn state laws regarding abortion due to the 10th Amendment, and even if it was the 2/3 Republican court would overturn it anyway.
      2. A constitutional amendment would require a 2/3 majority that Democrats will not have in this lifetime.
      • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        4 hours ago

        And so why weren’t the courts getting stacked the moment Biden took office?

        • Worstdriver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Two reasons:

          1. Ethics
          2. The GOP engaged in a campaign of doing everything, fair and foul, to prevent or at least slow this from happening.