President says ‘epidemic of gun violence is tearing our communities apart’ after mass shootings in Philadelphia, Fort Worth, Baltimore and Chicago

  • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    Suicide is not what first comes to mind when someone talks about gun violence or shootings. Nobody said they don’t count - just that it’s misleading.

    • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      It isn’t misleading at all. A gun death is a gun death to anyone who doesn’t have a bias.

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s just many of those deaths probably would have occurred anyways wether there is a gun ban or not.

        There are lots of ways to commit suicide, guns are just convenient. Now some of those deaths probably wouldn’t have happened because they may be spur of the moment decisions in a dark period, but many still would have.

        Not like the deaths of children who find their parents gun in the closet or the deaths of 5+ people in a grocery store with an automatic weapon.

        • moistclump@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Damn you’re cold. That’s 21,782 people’s lives we’ll never get back. Just this year. And we’re going to sit here debating whether their life is worth including.

          • TrontheTechie@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            No empathy like conservative empathy.

            These disingenuous folks will tell you these folks would’ve killed themselves anyways, but they say nothing about the fact that most people kill themselves over financial or medical hardship while they shrink the social safety net to be just big enough to catch CEOs with golden parachutes.

      • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bias? The point is that you’re not as likely to just be randomly shot at the street as those statistics might make it to seem.

        • moistclump@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          For me, it’s not about fear it’s about empathy. Seeing that number I didn’t think “oh no I’m going to get shot.” I thought, “that’s a lot of lives lost and families and friends impacted for the rest of their lives. A lot of permanent loss for the country. How can we have a meaningful impact that number?”

          • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah no I 100% agree that those numbers are insane and if it was my country I’d definitely want something done about it.

            It’s just that these statistics are often pulled out when talking about mass shootings for example and in that context including suicides and gang violence is a bit misleading in my opinion especially when the “true” numbers are just as horrific on their own.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think in the US a lot of murders probably get classified as suicides, accidents, and self defense to avoid launching an expensive, dangerous investigation, so I would also say that suicides are overreported.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Proof? no, if there were proof our data would simply have to be better than it is. Are there a lot of statistical and geographical tendencies working against this data that are easily pointed out, yes.

          The biggest ones: suicides usually occur in places where the body will be discovered and people who commit suicide tend to want to be found.

          Homocides tend to be covered up more often or occur in more remote locations; lots of unsolved homocides end up as missing persons, especially in less dense areas. A few are staged as suicides or accidents.

          So there’s absolutely a tendency for the data to skew in certain directions. This isn’t even addressing more chaotic problems liks a lack a lack of qualified coroners, incentives to not charge police who just riddle people with bullets, etc.

          • Im14abeer@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            To be clear I can’t stand the carnage and think it’s one of the country’s biggest faults. That being said, I’m not sure how what you’ve presented shows suicides as over reported. Suicide in a place likely to be found results in more accurate counting of suicide not extra deaths counted as suicide. Homicides being counted as missing persons doesn’t over count suicide, it under counts homicide. Police shootings actually likely under count suicide since no police shooting is going to be labeled “suicide by cop”. The qualified coroner thing is actually pretty crazy and a lot of places require little or no actual pathology knowledge, so who knows.

            All this to say when we boil these tragedies down to numbers, when the discussion is assault weapons bans, suicides probably don’t belong in the discussion. Disproportionally few suicides are committed with guns targeted by assault weapons bans. That doesn’t remove suicide from the gun deaths discussion at all. If I might offer an unsubstantiated opinion of my own, I believe suicidal people are probably more likely to benefit from mental health intervention than the serial killers who are mass shooters. (Which is the only acceptable solution to the right, not that they’re willing to pay for it.) Those a-hole attention whores ARE increasingly using guns that would likely be targeted in an AWB, and they’re doing it because it helps grab the headline and gets the president to talk about how terrible what you did was. In the meanwhile this is going to remain political fodder for politicians and cannon fodder for the rest of us.