• HStone32@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Honestly, I’ve only ever had problems with Wayland so far. So many times when I look up the issue tracker for a software I’m having issues with, the solution is always “switch to a DE that uses Xorg.”

    I get that it’s not a mature software yet, but neither should people be pushing to use it until it is.

    • basmati@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s called a paradox, it’ll never be mature software if people don’t move to it so edge cases can be found and fixed.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Not here. This is not linux desktop share where every actor is an independent agent and all options are viable. Xorg is developed by the same people doing Wayland, and they decided Xorg is dead and will only receive security updates. I agree that Wayland compatibility is still not fully mature. But unfortunately for all those devs the upgrade window is moving fast and eventually their software will be left behind unless they change to Wayland. At this point Xorg is not even the default anymore.

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I fully expect people to keep using a broken Xorg, not move into wayland, and not fork and keep it updated.

          But the devs are free to do whatever they want. No opinions there. I wouldn’t want to maintain Xorg either.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            2 months ago

            Totally, nothing in Linux land ever truly dies. Someone, somewhere will surely fork it once it is never updated anymore. But I wouldn’t want to be that person either.

            • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              If somebody was willing to do this, xorg would still be maintained.

              xorg is actually legitimately so terrible to work on that nobody is interested in doing this who actually knows how xorg works.

      • starbrite
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Unfortunately there’s no possible way to get screensavers working under wayland, which is what’s holding me back (also screensharing over Discord, but that’s not wayland’s fault)

    • Devorlon
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Aside from sway, I’m trying to think of a DE that doesn’t support Xorg.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      “Here, switch to this software! Except it doesn’t support half of the features of the old one and it never will. Why? Uhhhh idk security or something. What was that? Will we add a way to securely allow these things? Lol no”

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Global keyboard shortcuts, copy-paste, window position save/restore, screen recording, probably a few others I’m forgetting. I know some compositors implement these, but they aren’t part of the Wayland standard so it’s a bit hit-or-miss afaik.

          • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/issues/624

            ^ global shortcuts was moved to portals (as it should be, portals are a much more sane way of handling this) but is in pretty much all compositors (except wlroots, but that’s also being worked on and not in won’tfix)

            I don’t know what you’re talking about with copy-paste, that has worked for a millenia

            https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/-/merge_requests/264

            ^ window positioning (although still being worked on, definitely not in the category of won’tfix)

            https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/-/merge_requests/124

            ^ screencopy (screen recording)

            Literally none of these things are as described won’tfix for security reasons. Also, wayland is a core set of protocols, you’re meant to use the ext block for things that aren’t essential for basic functioning (such as screenshotting), that doesn’t mean they don’t work or aren’t implemented properly, they’re done separately because they AREN’T core to functioning, there are certain compositors that don’t want the ability to take screenshots, for example.

            None of those were actually true, can you list an actual example?

            Seems like FUD to me.

            • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Yeah I really don’t get what people are talking about, I’ve been using wayland basically exclusively since 2022 and I haven’t had any difficult to fix problems. For screensharing in the few things that don’t support the portal I just use OBS’ virtual webcam and everything else has just worked perfectly, or at least with way less issues than I ever had with X

        • starbrite
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Screensavers! I know they’re technically pointless in the modern era but dammit they make me happy

          • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            that’s not true either, nobody has bothered to port them but there’s nothing stopping you, this is also not a closed wontfix for security reasons thing at all.

            all you’d need to do is use layer-shell, it really wouldn’t be difficult at all, but nobody cares.

            edit: nvm it exists already https://sr.ht/~mstoeckl/wscreensaver/

            There really isn’t even one thing is there?