We’ve had some trouble recently with posts from aggregator links like Google Amp, MSN, and Yahoo.

We’re now requiring links go to the OG source, and not a conduit.

In an example like this, it can give the wrong attribution to the MBFC bot, and can give a more or less reliable rating than the original source, but it also makes it harder to run down duplicates.

So anything not linked to the original source, but is stuck on Google Amp, MSN, Yahoo, etc. will be removed.

  • OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Can we please just get rid of the propaganda bot instead? It’s bad at what it claims to do, and does nothing to stem the flow of disinformation here.

    If you really want users to think about their sources, then you should have a dedicated source discussion thread for every post.

    The bot actively and objectively makes Lemmy a worse platform. I’ve personally stopped recommending Lemmy to friends, and the bot is the top reason. (The other reason is the power users who astroturf the various news communities with their pet issues. Hopefully that will change after the election.)

    • aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      For a second I thought you were talking about our favorite high-traffic poster, who is now queue flooding 15 articles a day.

      • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Which one is the favorite? I’m starting to see more and more voices that aren’t quite as mainstream (yet) as Lemmy would like, so I think the diversity of thought and opinion is awesome.

    • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      So the reason you don’t recommend Lemmy is a bot that you can block if you don’t like it? That seems a little much, IMO

        • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I guess I’m confused. Why don’t you just block it? What offends you about it so much that you not only don’t want to see it, you don’t want anyone else to see it?

            • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              20 hours ago

              You know how I can tell someone is full of bullshit. When they start claiming they’re talking for everyone. From the comment you linked to:

              show callous indifference to how everyone in the community sees it…

              That’s patently untrue and weakens every argument you have about it. The funniest thing to me about all the anti-botters is that you all never bother to come up with a suggestion on how to improve it or change how it’s implemented. It’s this knee jerk emotional reaction that you then spend paragraphs rationalizing to each other.

              Within the constraints we have with Lemmy as the platform it is, the options for mods are limited for now. How do you propose addressing the issues that the bot attempts to solve if you get rid of the bot?

            • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              So you seem really angry about something and I was literally just asking for clarification on why you felt the way you did. Sorry for taking an interest

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      A dedicated source discussion thread for every post would have to be automated and, ideally, link to a source that checks the bias and credibility of the source…

      You just suggested what we’re already doing…

      • OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        People can link their own sources. There could be a dedicated community to keep track. Literally anything is better than the half-assed bot telling everyone what to think.