Music publishing companies notched another court victory against a broadband provider that refused to terminate the accounts of Internet users accused of piracy. In a ruling on Wednesday, the conservative-leaning US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit sided with the big three record labels against Grande Communications, a subsidiary of Astound Broadband.

The appeals court ordered a new trial on damages because it said the $46.8 million award was too high, but affirmed the lower court’s finding that Grande is liable for contributory copyright infringement.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    225
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Exactly what law states internet connections should be terminated for users accused of piracy?

    And are we going to selectively enforce this against poor people, or are they going to start demanding the trunk lines feeding AI datacenters be cut as well? (I asked rhetorically).

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Come on, you don’t think an industry that habitually uses automated takedown requests regardless of merit would falsely accuse anyone, do you?

    • DeathsEmbrace@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      AI shouldn’t be allowed to touch the internet because it’s basically stealing everything and never giving references which is plagiarism.

    • Gigasser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Might be a good idea to torrent whatever you need before the corpos manage to get some law passed that makes it so that isps will have to terminate users for that.

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          You want a protocol that will build physical last-mile connections to peoples’ houses?

              • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 hours ago

                It can cover a one-kilometer radius

                So most of the last mile.

                If we try to have cable or telcos do last-mile they’ll fuck us as hard as they possibly can, make laws guaranteeing themselves a permanent monopoly, etc.

                We need wireless as a backup just to keep those worthless fuckers honest, then we can do a hybrid model with some scattered fiber ONTs terminating into wifi nodes.

                What we really need is to string fiber on the power lines, but the telcos and comcast pay the power companies extra to stop that too.

                Break the monopoly power and this all comes tumbling down.

                • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  “And then we can do a hybrid model” congratulations you just invented an ISP.

                  “Then we’ll string wires on poles” congratulations you just invented an ISP again.

                  • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 hours ago
                    1. Actually, you’ve invented a cooperative.

                    2. Actually, you’ve just made internet access a utility.

                    Seriously, you seem really oblivious, the issue isn’t technology, we basically have magic at this point, the issue is breaking the economic model.