• dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Do you think AI and / or AGI is a possibly at all given enough time?

    Because if the answer is yes, then don’t we need people working on it all the time to keep inching towards that? I’m not saying that the current implementations are anywhere close, but they do have their use cases. I’m a software developer and my boss the lead engineer (the smartest person I’ve ever met) has made some awesome tools tools that save our company of 7 people maybe a 100 hours of work a month.

    People used to complain about the LHC and that’s made countless discoveries that help in other fields.

    • basmati@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      LLMs and GANs in general are to AI and AGI like a hand pumped well is to the ISS. Sure, they both technological marvels of their time, but if you’re wanting to float in microgravity there is no possible adjustment you can make to the former to get it to actually behave like the latter.