• 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I honestly think that in order to reach a “1 state solution” they have to go through the 2 state solution. Israel as its currently exists cannot coexist with arabs and, thanks to israel barbarism, arabs cannot tolerate israelis. They need decades of goodwill to amend the decades of barbarism, obviously the new Israel state has to be fundamentally different than the current Israel otherwise no progress will be made.

    • GlueBear [they/them] @lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Algeria liberated itself from France without the need for a “2-state” solution. Haiti, India, China, Lebanon, Syria, and many other nations have freed themselves from colonialism, without the need for a less than useless “2-state solution.”

      • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        completely different cases, in those cases the settlers were minorities. in Israel settlers have grown to be a majority, and thus the 1 state solution is not possible. genocide, unfortunately, works.

        • GlueBear [they/them] @lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          ?

          Majority in a region with ~200M Arabs?

          What? That’s like saying you can occupy Chihuahua because there will be more Americans than natives.

          Sure, if you completely disregard the existence of the rest of Mexico.

          • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            of course they can occupy Chihuaha if they kill enough natives, you don’t have to make up an hypothetical scenario it already happened in TEXAS. Or you know, literally all settler states.