But removing Denuvo DRM after 12 weeks ‘causes zero mean total revenue loss.’

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Not everybody follows that same diagram.

    On one end of things, many people don’t care at all if a game has Denuvo.

    On the other end, many pirates won’t buy a game they pirated even if they liked playing it.

    • nivellian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      “Many” so what’s your source for this?

      Also I have bought a bunch of games and I still pirate sometimes what are you talking.

      • Miaou@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        What’s yours? This whole “pirates are also buyers” is just a cop-out, but sure your anecdotic experience is valid proof against the more logical alternative

      • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        52 minutes ago

        Common sense logic kinda dictates that once people have obtained a product, they’re unlikely to go back an pay for the same product even if they liked what they got the first time. The only outlier I have seen, is with small(er) indie games where people are more likely to offer support. Someone pirating a AAA title, liking it and then buying it shortly after at full retail is pretty rare i would say.