So I’ve heard and seen the newest launch, and I thought for a private firm it seemed cool they were able to do it on their own, but I’m scratching my head that people are gushing about this as some hail mary.

I get the engineering required is staggering when it comes to these rocket tests, but NASA and other big space agencies have already done rocket tests and exploring bits of the moon which still astounds me to this day.

Is it because it’s not a multi billion government institution? When I tell colleagues about NASA doing stuff like this yeaaaars ago they’re like “Yea yea but this is different it’s crazy bro”

Can anyone help me understand? Any SpaceX or Tesla fans here?

  • i_ben_fine@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s not clear to me how SpaceX has managed to do things for cheaper. Are they cutting labor? QC?

    • thalience@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      Two things, mainly. They do a lot of the production steps in-house, as opposed to having a web of subcontractors (who have their own subcontractors)for each component. But the big thing is just efficiency of scale. Building and launching 100 rockets per year doesn’t cost 100 times more than one launch per year.

    • greyw0lv@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      They really haven’t yet. The concept is that reusable rockets will be cheaper than soviet era single use rockets… eventually.

      On a surface level it makes sense, taking a rocket refurbishing it, and refueling sounds cheaper. But its not. Not yet anyways. Too complex and expensive presently.