• Albbi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    To me it’s unethical to let someone suffer until they finally pass.

    • yannic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      That’s a false dichotomy.

      The principle of double effect allows one to attempt to relieve suffering with treatments having high mortality rates.

      Euthanasia is a cost-saving measure to avoid the high costs of palliative care for non-palliative patients, and in the examples cited in the article – healthcare in general.

      • Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        As a disabled person who does not make enough money to exist, this is how I see it for social programs as well. Keep the sick and injured in a constant state of anxiety and neediness until they finally break and ask for maid. It’s easier to get maid than it is to be respected as a human being.

        That being said, also as a sick/ disabled person I am glad maid does exist.