Basically the title

  • bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    24 hours ago

    There was still real competition in the x86 OS space back then, also. Like IBM had OS/2 and DOS 7, and made hardware, so they certainly wouldn’t want it locked to a Microsoft OS.

    • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      competition in the x86 OS space back then

      Oh yeah: there were a stuuuupid amount of OSes.

      On the DOS side you had MS, IBM, and Digital Research.

      You also had a bunch of commercial UNIXes: NextStep, Solaris, Xenix/SCO, etc. along with Linux and a variety of BSDs. There were also a ton of Sys4/5 implementations that were single-vendor specific so they could sell their hardware (which was x86 and not something more exotic) that have vanished to time because that business model only worked for a couple of years, if that.

      There was of course two different Windows (NT, 9x), OS/2 which of course could also run (some) Windows apps, and a whole host of oddballs like QNX and BeOS and Plan9 or even CP/M86.

      It was a lot less of a stodgy Linux-or-Windows monoculture, and I miss it.

      • bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I ran OS/2 Warp as my primary for like a year, I loved it, and it could even play many Windows/DOS games with fiddling

        • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          …I still have some OS/2 (or, rather, ArcaOS) systems running here.

          Mostly for a very limited subset of things that never really migrated across to “modern” windows - I have a BBS running on there because 16 bit DOS apps on OS/2 was pretty much the best way to run them when it was 1994, and in 2024 it’s still the best way to deal with them.