ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 1 day agoIn light of Linux removing ReiserFSslrpnk.netimagemessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1244arrow-down18
arrow-up1236arrow-down1imageIn light of Linux removing ReiserFSslrpnk.netByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-squareBlaster M@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·1 day agoInteresting to see how many features NTFS does support
minus-squareQuarterSwede@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·1 day agoThat’s why it’s still being used. Not a major reason to move on for MS. Sad to see APFS not on the list (I know why, just wanted to compare).
minus-squaresik0fewl@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 day agoNot sure if it’s gotten better in the last few years, but it’s also incredibly slow. Like orders of magnitude slower than ext3 or HFS.
minus-squareQuarterSwede@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 day agoI’ve never thought of APFS as slow. Didn’t realize it was.
minus-squaresik0fewl@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 day agoOops, replied to wrong comment! I was talking about NTFS.
minus-squareundefined@links.hackliberty.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoYeah that was kind of a weird take, I’ve never felt it being slow nor heard it is from anywhere else.
Interesting to see how many features NTFS does support
That’s why it’s still being used. Not a major reason to move on for MS.
Sad to see APFS not on the list (I know why, just wanted to compare).
Not sure if it’s gotten better in the last few years, but it’s also incredibly slow. Like orders of magnitude slower than ext3 or HFS.
I’ve never thought of APFS as slow. Didn’t realize it was.
Oops, replied to wrong comment! I was talking about NTFS.
Yeah that was kind of a weird take, I’ve never felt it being slow nor heard it is from anywhere else.