• lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    It can! For a while. Isn’t that the nature of speculation and speculative bubbles? Sure, they may pop some day, because we don’t know for sure what’s a bubble and what is a promising market disruption. But a bunch of people make a bunch of money until then, and that’s all that matters.

    • Vritrahan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The uncertainty of it is exactly why it shouldn’t suck up as much capital and resources as it is doing.

      • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Shouldn’t, definitely. But for a while, it will keep running, because that’s how a lot of speculative investment works.

        • Vritrahan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          I agree, and the problem is finance capitalism itself. But then it becomes an ideological argument.

          • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The argument could be made economically rather than ideologically.

            Capitalism has a failure mode where too much capital gets concentrated into too few hands, depressing the flow of money moving through the economy.

            But Capitalists start crying “Socialism!” as soon as you start talking about anti-trust.