• Hildegarde@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    the green party has nominated a candidate, and ran in every single presidential election since 1996. why would they suddenly decide to drop out now?

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      They should drop out because they have no path to victory, typically capture <1% of the vote, peaked at 2.7%, have no Senate seats, no house seats, no governorships - state or territorial, no chambers seats - upper or lower… But most importantly, they’re siphoning votes away from the more progressive viable option, providing meaningful support to the worst possible option in doing so.

      • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        those are not circumstances unique to this election.

        if the democrats are running a campaign that cannot succeed without a third party abandoning the strategy they’ve been using constantly for the past 28 years, they have already lost.

        the greens are not a chaotic force doing unpredictable things. if democrats don’t account for the greens doing what they always do, its their own fault if they lose.

        • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yes - the Democrats are at fault for arrogantly running an ineffective campaign like the institutionalists they are, and the Greens are at fault for aiding a hostile state actor and the unabashed fascists.

          Both are bad, though not in a comparable way.