Deterrence may be the only way to avoid WWIII.

Five billion is a tentative estimate. I haven’t checked the price of 235U and 239Pu on AliExpress.

  • Utter_Karate [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    I am under the impression that no step in the process, including the centrifugues to enrich uranium and the design of the bomb itself is really that difficult for modern engineering anymore and with the resources of a modern nation state on their side there are hundreds of thousands of people in the world who could produce a nuke fairly quickly. The problem with constructing a nuclear reactor is that it will need to be close enough to the surface that it will be vulnerable to attack, but a bomb can be made entirely in the underground facilities they already have. You can’t prevent a nation the size of Iran from having access to uranium and you can’t expect them not to be able to emulate 80-year-old technology. I am not an expert of course, but this made sense to me.

    • TankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I was under the impression that enrichment becomes more difficult as the purity increases and requires special hardware, but I’m also no expert.

      You’re correct!

      the same technology that can produce LEU for reactor fuel can also be used to produce HEU for nuclear weapons. There are no technical barriers to prevent countries with enrichment capabilities from using them to enrich uranium to the higher levels required for nuclear weapons, only legal prohibitions.

      https://tutorials.nti.org/nuclear-101/uranium-enrichment/

      Now I’m wondering why every nation doesn’t have nukes.

      • Utter_Karate [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Same reason Iran doesn’t. The political costs are really bad. Never mind that the US is already sanctioning Iran, deciding to get nuclear weapons would not be a popular move with Iran’s allies and probably not with its own population if it was done when there is no pressing need for it.

    • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Iran is like the second/third most sanctioned country and they do not have their economy organized in a rational (socialist) way. The costs for their projects are higher than countries that can freely trade materials and technology, they face extensive sabotage and large conventional military threats. Unlike the DPRK (until fairly recently, not while they were doing their nuclear program), Iran is consuming their weapons in proxy and direct confrontations and has to maintain and expand that production at the same time as any nuclear weapons programme. They also want better air defences & air power, better naval assets, and longer range missiles so the retaliatory threat of a future nuke can reach European-Yankee missiles instead of just Israel.