Hugh Nelson, 27, from Bolton, jailed after transforming normal pictures of children into sexual abuse imagery

  • vaguerant@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Before the “Well they’re just fictional images, so what’s the harm?” brigade shows up (hopefully we left them on Reddit), he was using photographs of real children. People would send him photos of children they knew in their personal lives who they wanted to see in sexual abuse situations and he would create the images. He was also convicted of encouraging the men he was talking to to rape children in real life.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes, that’s clearly sexual abuse of actual children.

      You know that’s different from fiction - right? Like it’s fundamentally worse than a drawing, because it’s fundamentally different from a drawing?

      • Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        You mean to tell me there’s nuance here? I want my morality to be black and white! Thinking is hard and I don’t want to do it.

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Because I wasn’t sure, the way your comment comes out swinging.

          Too many threads like this feature people who are convinced that corporate models were trained on hyper-illegal pornography (with accurate human labeling!) or that the absence of real human persons is no excuse. Like they’re not clear why this specific thing is as illegal as possible.